A queer reading of Twelth Night

Twelfth Night is one of the most popular Shakespeare ‘s comedies and it gets restaged really frequently. Though the drama itself does non incorporate any homosexual characters, it is believed to be one of the most homoerotic. Shakespeare non merely shaped his characters ‘ sexual involvements by their addresss but besides by their surrounding. The essay will first try a fagot reading of Twelfth Night and discourse the homoerotic potency in word picture of Shakespeare ‘s characters with mentions to theatre pattern and societal ambiances of Early Modern England.

Shakespearean theater has long been established as holding elements of an open sexual nature at its nucleus. It is frequently perceived as incorporating morally and ethically wrong constructs or underlying violative and flooring content from a base point refering to the socially defined thoughts of virtuousnesss and decency of the early modern period. These disputing constructs that range from the socially awkward to the sexually perverse, can be regarded as holding a direct consequence on, and with, the audience of the clip. Basically, we can see that through Shakespeare’s onslaughts on the esthesias of his clip that he was reviewing the dominant powers that belonged to the steadfast hierarchy of England. From this position, we can see impressions of societal clumsiness and sexual perversion as being challenges to this order and authorization, possibly even so far as to the extent that they were portion of a radical motion within the humanistic disciplines. For case, when sing the strength of the Churches principle and he institutional clasp that it had on society, so the position of the usage of corruption within the humanistic disciplines additions some cogency. Similarly, the engagement of the perverse and elements of the so socially forbidden construct of homosexualism, could be interpreted as an artistic device employed by Shakespeare to expose all aspects of the human status. For illustration, we can see from many of his dramas that the usage of lunacy was aimed at pull stringsing the audience’s esthesias, so as to intentionally daze and estrange them in relation to some of his characters and thoughts prevalent to the dramas. However, to see the usage of homosexualism as a merely artistic device belonging to the impression of perversion would possibly be inappropriate and derogatory. For illustration, it would look unlikely that this was all that Shakespeare had intended when sing factors highlighted by literary critic Louis Montrose, in his principle that the drama in the early modern period was ‘an emergent cultural form‘ ( Montrose 1996 ) . Elaborating on the impression of the theater as an emerging cultural signifier, Montrose suggested that,

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

‘These stuff and ideological inventions could non be made to conform comfortably to preexistent topographic points in the traditional strategy of things. Elementss of this shared civilization continued to determine and specify the premises, beliefs, outlooks, and actions of the dwellers of late Elizabethan England.’ ( Montrose, 1996, p. 20 )

We can see from this so that the theater and the dramas at this clip were non signifiers in which revolution and corruption were needfully employed, but where thoughts were instilled to arouse new societal thought. It is hence improbable that any expressed word pictures of homosexualism were acceptable signifiers of literary and dramatic look in early modern times, given the dogmatic countenances of the church and Godhead regulation that dominated society and societal thought through spiritual philosophy and the hierarchy of kingship. However, these characteristics of homosexualism were still permitted and we can see many cases of this throughout the word picture and drama,Twelfth Night.

The issue of gender uncertainness and cross-dressing inTwelfth Nightis one of prominence and has provided many different readings. For case, one of the chief characters throughout the drama is Viola, whose ain narrative involves masking herself as a male. Through this she causes much confusion and misinterpretation in relation to people’s feelings refering to the drama. This behavior is non foreign to the period of the Renaissance and would most likely have been easy recognised by the audience as that of convention. One such account for this is that during this period females were non allowed to play functions in theaters and so males had to cross-dress so as to play any female functions. However, we can see an dry switch of gender in the drama, where a immature adult female cloaks her gender under the pretense of a immature adult male. This same feature is evident in the character of Cesario, who is Viola male pseudo-name when in camouflage. We see that he is considered stamp, fine-looking and with n unsure sort of beauty. In kernel, he is feminine. This baffled gender relation between feminine and male and the symbolic camouflage of gender through cross-dressing in the drama continues even when the existent gender of Viola is revealed. Furthermore, we see that her lover Orsino is attracted to the masculine in her, more so than the feminine, which was eminent in the homosexualism of the Renaissance period.

In footings of homosexuality we can see from the attitude and feelings of Orsino towards Viola dressed as a adult male that the impression of concealed desire is stronger than the recognised institutionalized kineticss of the explicit and conventional heterosexual relationships in the drama. We see the conventional heterosexual impression of love in Orsino’s fondnesss towards Olivia. However, from the minute that he sees Viola dressed as a adult male, we see that he feels something particular towards her in a manner non understood in his fondnesss for Olivia. This mixture of maleness and muliebrity through the conventional, instead than subversive, usage of cross dressing would be understood by the audience due to the conventional impression of cross dressing in theater. However, his insurgent attractive force to the feminised adult male is besides crystalline. Basically, we see that Viola in camouflage inspires him to uncover himself closely in ways that conventional heterosexual relationship did non. In this the audience is able to witness the romatic feelings of fondness that one adult male has towards another, accepted through the medium of camouflage.

With the character of Antonio, we see Shakespeare prosecuting with the construct of love and the impression of matrimony, which in Renaissance times was chiefly based upon the societal establishment of position. We see that he talks of ‘his willing love’ ( Shakespeare, 1994, p.378, III, 3 ) that finally urges him to go with Sebastian to Illyria, despite the possibility of being discovered and later killed. We see that, while stating the narrative of his salvaging Sebastian, he makes it cognize that he relieved him with “sanctity of love” ( Shakespeare, 1994, p.378, Act III, 4 ) . Antonio offers Sebastian his house, his clip, his love and his money apparently adoring Sebastian unconditionally.

Determining Antonio as a homosexual character and a representation of homosexualism, we can see that Shakespeare is depicting a nonreversible love. Despite put on the lining his life for Sebastian by attach toing him to Illyria, it is understood by Antonio that his love will ne’er be reciprocated. This is because Sebastian will finally get married Olivia. However, the impression of matrimony did non needfully belong to the impression of love in the early modern period. Therefore, in footings of the dramas relation to the audience, this emphasises the inability for a traditional happy stoping synonymous with matrimony, and means that in world his love was realised and able to thrive exterior of that loveless establishment, however. In this sense, we can see that Antonio’s homosexual fondness is a romantic unconditioned 1 that has little or nil to make with matrimony at all. In this case, matrimony can be seen as symbolic of the planned practise that involved the compatibility of involvements, intents and commissariats of welth and usage concerned with the socially normal heterosexual relationship. We can see how this is important tactic employed by Shakespeare when we look at the function of convention of his clip.

Following from Montrose, it was suggested by cultural historicist Stephen Greenblatt that to assume power and convention over the topics of any given land or civilization, there had to be a control over the subversive-ness of that society every bit good ( Greenblatt, 1988 ) . For case, he suggested that if one was suspected of corruptions so that individual could be held accountable and made an illustration of by the constitution. Greenblatt wrote, ‘thus insurgent cape that is echt and extremist is at the same clip contained by the power it would look to threaten’ ( Greenblatt, 1988, p.6 ) . With this, we can see that Shakespeare could non explicitly show the success of a homosexual relationship in any conventional signifier such as the happy stoping found in matrimony. If he had done so so he would most surely have been deemed a subvert, given the perverse nature by which homosexualism was considered. However, by implicitly reviewing matrimony as the ’power’ that ’contains’ homosxuality, so he was able to uncover it as a construct that does non mean love go forthing homosexualism to be free from this loveless and ludicrous entity. In this we can see that homosexualism is non used as a tool to overthrow the conventional norms of society, but as a symbolic representation of that which existed throughout the society through a poetics instead than an establishment. For case, Greenblatt farther elaborates his point by reasoning that the poetics of the conventional was,

‘Power that relies on monolithic constabulary setup, a strong in-between category atomic household, an luxuriant school system, power that dreams of a panoptical in which the most intimate secrets are unfastened to the position of an unseeable authority’ ( Greenblatt, 1988, p.8 )

We can see from this that the range for reenforcing convention was wholly institutional. The deduction of this is that corruption in Elizabethan theater was non needfully a radical act, but on the reverse, an indispensable foil to reenforce the conventional. It would look so that Shakespeare used both the conventional and the revolutionist in the homosexual representation of Antonio so as to portray a homosexualism that was born of love and desire.

We can see that there is a impression of homosexuality and that it functions as a equivalent word for same-sex attractive force and a baffled mixture of gender, that in the modern-day clime can be determined as a representation of an array of sexual orientations, such as androgyny, homosexualism or hetero-flexible and is repeated throughoutTwelfth Night. However, it is necessary to appreciate that Shakespeare ne’er explicitly exhibits homosexual relationships for grounds that Greenblatt and Montrose make clear. It would look that due to the societal esthesias of the clip he alternatively creates conventional state of affairss, doing his characters behave in peculiar ways that strongly indicate a homosexualism through the confusion of gender. Homosexuality can so be seen through the poetics of both the conventional and the revolutionist, made peculiarly clear through Shakespeare’s amusing usage of camouflage and his review of the establishment of love. For case, through camouflage we are able to see that Violaunveils the desires of both Orsino and Olivia ; symbolic of a adult male and a adult female. Sing this as a device, Shakespeare is so able to convey the thought of same-sex attractive force, without confronting persecution as a subvert. Of class, the esthesias of society and what was seen as dissenter in Shakespeare’s clip is barely the same as the esthesias of modern-day society. However, when we take into history the cultural and historical significance of such constructs we can get down to understand the purpose and implied significance of such cases within the drama. Therefore, in the instance ofTwelfth Night, we can see that the function of what was perceived in the society of the early modern period as sexual perversion was, and still is ; an built-in constituent to the drama itself and modern twenty-four hours readings of the gender of these characters is later unfastened to an array of gender based readings.

Bibliography

Greenblatt, S. , ( 1988 ) ‘Invisible Bullets’ , extracts fromShakespearian Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. California: The University of California Press.

Montrose, L. , ( 1996 ) The Purpose of Playing: Shakspere and the Cultural Politicss of the Elizabethan Theatre Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

Shakespeare, W. , ( 1994 )Twelfth Night: What You Will; Taken FromThe Complete Works of Shakespeare( 1994 ) Glasgow: Harper Collins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *