Approaching the terminal of the narrative Leper Lepellier becomes a more outstanding character in the narrative. After doing anticipations, we eventually acquire to see how Leper really copes with being in the ground forces. As seen he has done ill. In an effort to support his state Leper has been casted as being brainsick due to an effusion during an assembly with the other soldiers. This truly helped to give me a graphic thought of what Leper is like. I can clearly see that when he is placed out of his component he overreacts and is uneasy. The cogent evidence for this decision lies within his effusion, I ne’er would hold thought that he would move in such a manner as he is really unagitated and collected throughout the beginning of the book. Leper is besides of import during the mock “ test ” that Brinker is holding for Gene, sing Finny ‘s hurt. He is of import as he is the lone known individual to hold a graphic memory of how it all happened and he is able to give an history of Finny ‘s hurt in the Assembly Hall. The characters that remain to be of import are Finny and Gene. The whole narrative is based around Gene and Finny, more so Gene than Finny. It paperss Gene ‘s “ coming of age ” as he grows and becomes old plenty to enlist in the ground forces. It besides paperss Finny ‘s life, covering his relationship with Gene, his hurt all the manner up until is decease.

B ) Where has the narrative gone now? Why do you believe this happened? How long has it taken for the narrative to stop? ( How many yearss, months did the narrative happen over? )

The narrative comes to a stopping point after Finny ‘s decease. The school twelvemonth ends at Devon and Gene ‘s category graduates. Brinker decides to enlist in the ground forces and Gene comes to the realisation the he will shortly hold to make the same but he does n’t desire it to go on at Devon. I believe these events happened after Finny ‘s decease to give a sense of closing to the narrative. If the narrative had ended when Finny died there would be no closing, although the last chapter is n’t the most interesting I believe it sums up the book and gives the reader the feeling of sorrow. I believe the feeling of sorrow you are left with as a reader fits this book absolutely as it was set during a war and with a war there is sadness, with a war there is both decease and victory and I believe this book captures that really good. The narrative has taken topographic point over the period of a twelvemonth. It started in the summer session ( 1942 ) , went through the winter session, into the spring and ended at the beginning of the summer ( 1943 ) .

degree Celsius ) As you read today, what surprised you? Explain how this will impact the narrative or how it changed your thought of the narrative.

My initial reaction of the book was that it would be a narrative of how two adolescents grow up during a war and are able to make so while avoiding contact with the war. I ab initio thought this because of Finny ‘s denial of the war even bing. However, when Finny mentioned that he had written many letters to build up forces bespeaking them to let him to enlist in them, it surprised me because I thought he was seeking to avoid the war and non acquire involved in it. This changed the tone of the narrative for me, I began to believe that Finny ‘s denial was merely to dissemble the inevetible truth they both him and Gene would finally fall in the ground forces. I began to believe of the narrative as being a narrative of two adolescents seeking to “ populate ” every bit much as they could before they finally put their lives on the line in war. Ultimately the biggest shocker in this narrative for me was that Finny died. I was astonished when he died ( I really stopped and read that portion twice to see if I read it right ) . As seen in portion 2 I predicted that Finny would to the full retrieve because I felt that Finny was “ particular ” and “ gifted ” but I was wholly incorrect, and I kind of wished my anticipation came true because everyone likes a narrative with a happy stoping. But this narrative did n’t stop merrily, it ended with a drab closing that for me personally truly sums up the feeling of life during a war.

vitamin D ) What was the last of import thing that happened? Did it somehow “ sum up ” all that went before? Why or why non? Make the fresh terminal at this concluding of import incident or travel on? Why did it stop at this point? If it continues, so how and why does the fresh terminal?

The last of import thing that happened in this narrative was Finny ‘s decease after his 2nd autumn. This is of import because it does convey an terminal to all the wondering and guess I had before as a reader. From the point of me looking at the screen seeking to happen out what the tree symbolised, to the creative activity of the Suicide Society that jumped off the tree, so to Finny ‘s autumn that leaded to his hurt, it was all summed up in that one minute of his decease. That ‘s where all the guess ended, where all the symbolised were defined and where for me the narrative ended. Anything after that was merely at that place to stop the flashback and convey the novel back to the present clip. The novel did n’t stop after Finny ‘s decease, it continued to document Gene ‘s life until the terminal of the school twelvemonth and finally the flashback ended and Gene began to talk back in the present as to how he feels now. The novel ended this manner to convey closing to Gene ‘s flashback and to stop on the same premiss that it started, with Gene talking from his present point of position on the events that occurred during WWII at the Devon school.

vitamin E ) As you look back, does it look to you that this was the “ narrative of ” something? Why do you believe the writer wrote the narrative? What message do you believe that the writer is seeking to portion? Why was it worth stating? What does it learn? Give inside informations.

This narrative is a coming of age novel. It is a narrative of “ male childs ” going “ work forces ” and get downing as a adolescent and stoping up as an grownup who can enlist in the ground forces. The writer wrote this narrative to convey a message, which was “ sometimes your greatest enemy, comes from within ” . I believe this is the chief message of the narrative because Finny ‘s hurt was caused by Gene it was caused after the conversation that Gene had with Finny about Gene holding competition within their class for holding the highest norm. After this Gene realised that even though Finny was his best friend and they were truly close he was still better than him in some facets ( sports ) . Therefore, he caused Finny ‘s hurt. Gene ‘s enemy was n’t truly Finny, his existent enemy was himself being covetous of others who are better than him. So he acted on inherent aptitude and caused Finny to fall to do him better than Finny. This message is deserving stating because there are many covetous people in the universe, people who “ hatred ” others for being better than them and envy what others have because they do n’t hold the same thing. Being covetous is your greatest enemy, by non appreciating what you have you are doing yourself your greatest enemy. This narrative teaches that you should look for the best in yourself and appreciate what you have and appreciate your endowments because if you envy others you are doing you your greatest enemy.

degree Fahrenheit ) Explain why you liked or disliked the novel. Include an sentiment about the actions of the characters.

I really was surprised that I have come to wish this book over the class of reading it. However I can state that one of my chief grounds for wishing this book is Phineas. In my sentiment if there was no Phineas there would be no book and frankly I would n’t hold liked the book at all if he was n’t in it. I truly like Finny ‘s character. I like how he can talk his manner out of any bad state of affairs and acquire himself out of problem by making so. I like his strenuosity and I like how he is ever energetic even in the worst state of affairss. This is clearly seen when even though he is injured he decided to get down a winter carnival at Devon to raise everyone ‘s liquors. I like Finny because he possesses some features which I aspire to hold myself. I know I would ne’er be able to acquire away with things the manner he does because it ‘s merely unrealistic for me but, it would be truly nice to be able to make so. On the other manus there is Gene, I like Gene because in some ways he ‘s like me in the sense that he has really high academic ends and he is willing to work hard to accomplish them. Although Gene is similar to me there is one action that truly differentiates Gene from me. That action is when he causes Finny to fall off the tree and interrupt his leg. I would ne’er make something like this and I disagree with his actions. He did n’t hold to make this, he chose to because of his interior devils. I believe he could hold acted otherwise, he could hold merely discussed his issues with Finny and Finny could hold helped him with his jobs. I believe it was non until it was said that Finny broke his leg that Gene truly realised that he could hold acted otherwise and non wound his best friend. Although I do n’t wish Gene ‘s character after completing the book I can do some connexions with him, therefore it adds to my liking of the book.

g ) Compare and contrast this novel to the novel studied in category.

There are many similarities between “ A Separate Peace ” and “ The Catcher in the Rye ” . Most notably they are both written in the same manner, they are both flashbacks and they are both narrated by one individual. So in kernel they are both like personal diaries about the storytellers past. Both these books end in a similar manner the both do n’t hold that typical “ fairy narrative ” stoping of “ they live merrily of all time after ” they both end with some closing and the information that is at that place at the terminal is adequate to sum up the narrative and stop all guess that would come with reading the book. The biggest difference between these two books is the scene. “ The Catcher in the Rye ” takes topographic point in the mid 1950 ‘s much after the war so there is no reference of a war in the narrative and besides it is majorly set in New York whist this book takes topographic point in the New England part of the United States. Both these narratives take topographic point in really different clip periods and that is clearly seeable in the temper that the narrative gives off. In the “ The Catcher in the Rye ” the temper is less drab and more “ wellbeing ” than “ A Separate Peace ” . However with this difference a noticeable similarity between these narratives are the chief characters. Both Holden and Gene have grown up greatly and are now repenting their past evildoings. They both are seeking to get the better of their ain ego struggle throughout the narratives and they both end up recognizing where they went incorrectly, this becomes the moral of the narrative. Although being set in different clip periods where the scene has different affects on the character there are many similarities in manner and in the chief characters of both “ The Catcher in the Rye ” and “ A Separate Peace ” .