Plath ‘s verse form ‘The Mirror ‘ and Eliot ‘s “ The Hollow Men ” are two pieces of poetry that provide contrasting discourses about the experiential construct of disapprobation that world faces and the deficiency of assurance that defines who we are. Essentially both poets agree upon the issue of individuality crisis/alienation of how people see themselves. Sylvia Plath ‘s calling began at the age of eight, but so spiralled into a life of depression and self-destructive endeavours- such a life is clearly demonstrated in her work “ The Mirror ” – the point of this verse form was that Plath believed we will hold to confront the truth about ourselves and that the mirror is in kernel, cruel merely like the universe we live in. Eliot on the other manus experienced a life of success, establishing popular diary “ Criterion ” , this does non determine the manner in which “ The Hollow Men ” is written but possibly adds edification to the subject of “ Hollowness ” and the manner in which Eliot remarks on the puppetry that is the Hollow Men.
Plath and Eliot lived two really different lives, one of success, the other of depression and attempted self-destruction. The early life of Eliot describe one who felt the success of a poet who thrived in the modern universe nevertheless he tends to compose more desolate works reprobating the universe around him. On the other manus Plath struggled with life, with efforts of self-destruction at a immature age and a failed recovery with electroconvulsive therapy – which merits the manner in which she taunts the manner she sees herself in “ The Mirror. Her societal power was miniscule compared to Eliots, and this shaped a sense of resentment that can be interpreted from the verse form.
Condemning the World
Despite their contrasting discourses, these two poets find common land amongst the subject of individuality. The individuality of the hollow work forces is that they are empty, stressing this by repeating the words “ hollow ” , “ empty ” and “ stuffed ” over and over once more throughout the poetries.
We are the hollow work forces
We are the stuffed me
17. as the hollow work forces
18. The stuffed work forces
53. in this hollow vale
65. of empty work forces [ ‘The Hollow Men – T.S Eliot ]
These work forces appear empty, nothingness of any existent personality ; merely shells. The talker is non merely a base in for the poet ; it is about as if words are being put into their oral cavities. The voices seemed to differ throughout the poetry and give the feelings of a splintered tone of voice- like that of a broken mirror and broken images are speckled throughout.
At times the hollow work forces can look about self-pitying such as when they cry “ alas! ” [ Line 4 ] and at other times they speak in sophisticated symbolic linguistic communication which does non resemble mundane linguistic communication for illustration “ ageless star/multifoliate rose ” [ lines 63-64 ] . The hollow work forces are being manipulated by person who wants to reprobate them, like that of marionettes. Their puppet-master does non allow them qualify themselves, which reinforces the point of world ‘s battles to specify them. Plath ‘s verse form gives insight into the troubled life of a adult female, who looks into her mirror everyday of her life “ Each forenoon it is her face that replaces the darkness ” [ line 7, stanza 2 ] . The talker in this prose is the mirror, it does non hold any true feeling or emotions, yet Plath personifies it by giving the mirrors perspective, like it is able to believe and hold intelligent ideas. The adult female ‘s individuality alterations each forenoon that she looks in the mirror, irrespective of whether the adult female dislikes her ain contemplation ; she still manages to return to the mirror, and becomes dependent upon the mirror or her contemplation in general to see who she is as a individual alternatively of being able to specify herself without the mirror as an assistance. Identity is a factor that both characters seem to fight with, and it is the manner in which the writers empower them towards the terminal of the verse form that makes their positions of the universe so distressing.
Two Very Different Endings
Both Eliot and Plath chose to upset their readers throughout their verse forms, and every bit every bit much in their ultimate decision. Most readers identify with Eliot ‘s verse form because of the last poetry:
This is the manner the universe ends
this is the manner the universe ends
this is the manner the universe ends
Not with a knock but a whine.
This is so frequently remembered because people tend to wish narratives with dramatic terminations, what better than the history of the universe? When compared to the remainder of the verse form when you read the concluding lines, it becomes perceptible that the verse form is non so much about the terminal of the universe, as about people ( the Hollow Men ) who sit and merely talk and live their life without of all time seeking to set their beliefs or thoughts into pattern. Plath ‘s decision to her readers fazing placement is said in two simple lines ;
8.In me she has drowned a immature miss, and in me an old adult female
9.Rises toward her twenty-four hours after twenty-four hours, like a awful fish
From this line it is obvious that this mirror has been a portion of this miss ‘s full life, and it is clear that each forenoon that adult female is forced to look into the mirror at her old face, which some yearss is unrecognisable as her ain. The point that Plath was seeking to do was that, finally, we will hold to confront the truth about ourselves, and accept who we are, and our visual aspect, before it consumes our full life and felicity ceases to be, which unluckily occurred in Plath ‘s ain life. In the terminal, the mirror really was cruel, which mirrors the universe we live in, because finally what is cruel is reality itself.
Now to Conclude?
The topic of life and disapprobation about world was a common subject among twentieth century poets, Eliot and Plath explored this construct in different ways, through the eyes of humanity and through the eyes of themselves in a brooding confession. It is clear that in their plants neither Eliot nor Plath believed any positive traits that come with life ; their misanthropic positions of the universe around them gave a reaction of brooding letdown with the universe in general which is apparent in their blunt representations of what they saw. Analyzing verse form is eliminating them ; but, to understand the writer is to better understand the verse form, for the illustration of Plath, understanding the adversities that she had endured, from such a immature ages, allows the reader better comprehension of her work and possibly a somewhat more personal one at that. I am possibly non the ideal reader for these kinds of poetry, I have no experience with depression like Plath, nor did I receive a Harvard instruction, but what I can associate to is waking up every forenoon and looking at my contemplation in the mirror, and ne’er being content with what my eyes lay upon. These two verse forms were chosen on a caprice, but I think the thought of human suffering- and the fact that, finally, it ‘s our ain actions that cause us trouble- truly resonates with people, like me. For illustration Shakespeare made profound experiential constructs popular, like Coldplay do now and in the same manner that Eliot and Plath did during the twentieth century.