Context Surrounding The Leader English Literature Essay

Elizabeth Tudor inherited a province that was on the threshold of impairment. This Queen reigned in an epoch that would subsequently go known as the Golden Age. As she, the materfamilias, dusted off the cobwebs of a disruptive epoch, and brought approximately stabilization to give her province a true individuality. By the terminal of her reign England was noted as the richest and most powerful province in Europe.

Having been deemed bastard, after the executing of her female parent, and been imprisoned by her devout Catholic sister for offenses of liaising and back uping Protestants. Elizabeth rose from a life of bastardy and biass, to govern with a holistic position peculiarly sing faith. One of her first Acts of the Apostless as Queen was to set up a united Church, as she said we all believe in God. Elizabeth saw this integrity of vision as a manner to fall in her people, her chief attention. This constitution of a cohesive Church outraged the Catholic bishops. These Bishops ne’er recognised the Queen and normally referred to her as the asshole queen.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The girl of King Henry VIII, was good educated in many linguistic communications and had a natural genius for poetry. This was apparent throughout her reign in her many addresss as queen. As her first gesture as queen – for the incorporate church – was put frontward for ballot. She called on her cabinet to vote consequently to their scruples inquiring them to retrieve that “ in your custodies upon this minute lies the future felicity of my people and peace of this kingdom, allow that be on your scruples besides ” ( Kapur 1998 ) . Here we see her first-class ability to supply a vision of unanimity, to a state that is divided and in convulsion. This address resulted with the gesture passed. Elizabeth was now Supreme Governor of the Church of England.

Describe the leader in brief ;

Elizabeth was a magnetic, refined, reflectionist type of leader. She ne’er acted with hastiness and aspired to “ move as my witting dictates ” ( Kapur 1998 ) when I am queen. She had a preference to scoff many of the traditional conventions established. Such as taking a hubby and procuring an inheritor to her throne.

Elizabeth took a nonliteral matrimony with England, here she could put claim to a life of virginity, with her one true love being the kingdom. This induced a wooing that aspired holiness to her province, from this act she was dubbed the “ Virgin Queen ” . Her people recognised her dedication and she was revered among her followings. She purported herself as the virgin female parent of her province. While each male monarch should be revered as a male parent and each adult male a hubby to their state.

Many European leaders offered their manus in matrimony the queen. She used these short lived wooings to plamause foreign dealingss. Though her purpose was ne’er to yield to any of these progresss, she forged dealingss and confederations throughout her term of office, which allowed her to boom as queen trustee. “ Her maidenlike celibacy was hence interoperated non as a mark of political or societal lack, but instead as a self-contradictory symbol of the power of a adult female who survived to regulate despite illegitimization, subordination of female to male in the order of primogeniture, patriarchate, and masculine domination, and who remained unwed at a clip when official discourses favored matrimony and attacked the cloistered vow of celibacy and fear of the Virgin Mary. ( King 1990 ) “

From the get downing Elizabeth ‘s term of office is a noncompliant battle. From inheriting a hapless and divided province she must besides suppress many other menaces from within her ain cabinet, foreign ground forcess and a retribution seeking Catholic Church. Her absolute political understanding and other leading qualities to be confirmed lend themselves to this inspirational sovereign.

The leaders competences analysed ;

Communication

Communication is by and large defined as the exchange of information between entities. There are three good accomplishments a leader should hold when it comes to communicating:

1. Clarity of Communication: These means that a leader ‘s messages use accessible linguistic communication are concise and do non swerve off subject. Clear communicating is good because it means that the message gets across and it will non hold to be repeated therefore salvaging clip. In add-on to this, there will be fewer errors caused by misunderstandings ( Hargie et al. 2004 p. 20 ) ( Major 1990, p. 5 ) .

2. Recognises communicating as a two manner procedure: A good leader takes into history the suggestions and thoughts of subsidiaries because it is understood that he/she does non hold all the replies. Utilises the wisdom of crowds, this is good for an administration because subsidiaries feel less resentful when they can play an active function in determination devising and it allows a larger pool of thoughts to come in ( Hargie et al. 2004 p. 21 ) .

3. Charismatic: Skillfully uses linguistic communication when communication. Is a force of personality. It is good for a leader to be magnetic when communication because it gets people to pay attending, intending the message is more likely to be carried efficaciously ( Murphy 1998, p. 6 ) .

It is clear that Queen Elizabeth I recognised the importance of communicating. This is shown in the scene where she is rehearsing the address she intends to do before parliament on the issue of Church reform. The queen displays the accomplishments listed above throughout the film:

1. Elizabeth shows herself to be a most clear communicator when clear communicating is called for. When she is doing her address to parliament on spiritual reform she really clearly states what she wants and why she wants it. She stresses that in order to last England needed the ‘unity of religion ‘ it was missing. She claims that her proposals are non heresy as some have said but ‘common sense. ‘ We besides see how she makes it really clear that she is non interested in matrimony before the movie ‘s terminal.

2. When Elizabeth foremost becomes queen, she is really susceptible to the sentiments of others, peculiar her head adviser, William Cecil. Elizabeth becomes more self-asserting as the movie goes on but she still recognises the importance of listening. The movie ‘s epilogue provinces that she kept Francis Walsingham as a stopping point adviser until his ain decease, many old ages subsequently.

3. The queen is surely a magnetic communicator. We see this in the address she makes to parliament when she uses temper against the skeptics and entreaties to the scrupless of the members of parliament, stating them that the future felicity of England is in their custodies. Elizabeth makes adept usage of linguistic communication throughout the movie. For illustration, in the shutting scene when she says that she will non get married any adult male because she is ‘married to England. ‘

Flexibility

Flexibility means the ability of a leader to accommodate manners of leading to accommodate altering state of affairss or new realizations. Flexibility does non intend altering leading manners all of the clip. Rather flexibleness means altering manners when the state of affairs demands it. Flexibility has been described as the smart center land between utmost stringency and overreaction ( Volberda 1996, p. 360 ) . Elizabeth shows herself to be a flexible leader in this film.

For illustration, although Elizabeth was a clear communicator when she needed to be as described above, she could besides give really obscure messages she needed to. We see this when she refuses to give a clear reply to the Duke of Anjou ‘s matrimony proposal, in order to maintain her options open. The queen ‘s sentiments of the thought of matrimony itself change strongly during the movie, once more demoing her flexible, adaptative manner of leading. Elizabeth is originally led to believe that matrimony is necessary therefore safeguard her land ( as it will likely take to an inheritor ) by William Cecil and other advisers. However, Elizabeth realises that any adult male she married would seek to fundamentally assume her powers, so she decides non to get married at all.

Elizabeth ‘s strong communicating accomplishments allowed her to do clear her sentiments on matrimony and her reform on the church, assisting to do successful in holding her positions enacted. Elizabeth ‘s flexible manner helped to do her a successful leader. We saw how the adult male around her tested to rule her, and now uncertainty there would hold been great jobs if she had really gotten married.

Team Work

Team work is an of import facet to any holistic mechanism of a procedure, mistily put ; squad work is like the bolts and sleep together all working together to hold one common result. The remainder will be greater from a squad unit than an single working solo. West ( 1994, p.1 ) states ;

“ When we work co-operatively we can carry through boundlessly more than if we work separately. This is the rule of synergy – that the whole is greater than the amount of its single parts. In many countries of human activity and enterprise, research has shown how group working can take to greater efficiency or effectivity. ”

Three of import concepts of teamwork that leaders would necessitate to hold a house understanding to make synergism and be considered are:

“ A high degree of interpersonal accomplishment in giving clear way, appropriate feedback and equal support. A team leader must be an intelligent decision-maker ” West ( 1994, p.81 ) .

Elizabeth was able to pull off her squad when there had to be a determination made sing occupying Scotland even though she was n’t in a province of lucidity within her ain head. Elizabeth spoke to each member at the tabular array to have their positions on whether or non they should come in into war – she herself, “ does non similar war, they have unsure results ” , nevertheless listening to the feedback from her squad advisers she went against her ain best involvement of avoiding conflict and gave the way to come in into war.

“ A squad leader must be an intelligent determination shaper since pull offing a squad frequently involves working in state of affairss of high ambiguity and uncertainness while doing opinions about appropriate constructions and procedure within the squad ” West ( 1994, p.81 ) .

Within the film this was rather apparent when Elizabeth had to recess parliament sing a integrity of faith, they were unmistakably her squad of advisers. Elizabeth portrayed a high degree of interpersonal accomplishments such as assurance, lucidity of communicating, cognition and multi-dimensional thought. She provided appropriate feedback to the concerns of ambiguity that were raised and even used tempers to derive a common land with the squad for illustration ; a bishop asked her about “ coercing them to go forth their faith ” within that Elizabeth responded, “ how could she coerce them, she was merely a adult females ” .

“ The anxiousness created by uncertainness and the struggle created by interpersonal troubles between squad members or with team leaders necessarily requires a good grade of emotional resiliency ” . West ( 1994, p.81 )

The context where this statement was most apparent throughout the film was the force per unit area Elizabeth was confronting to get married and hold an inheritor. It was apparent throughout the film that Elizabeth felt the force per unit area from her squad of advisers nevertheless she resisted their thoughts which caused uncertainness and struggle amongst the squad claiming that the state was a weak mark for invasion.

Ethical Leadership

“ Those who will most purely adhere to ageless rules, such as unity, character, honestness, morality, spiritualty, compassion, doggedness, trueness and regard for human self-respect can go up to 500 % more effectual as leaders ” . ( Covey, 1992 )

Elizabeth portrayed a good grade of moralss throughout the film and as stated by Elizabeth within the film when she was pleading to parliament to help in the determination devising that the members of parliament had to do, “ each of you must vote harmonizing to your scruples, but retrieve this in your custodies upon this minute lies the future felicity of my people and the peace of this kingdom, allow that be upon your scruples ” .

Earlier in the film we seen how unhappy Elizabeth was sing the fact that there was a kid sent to conflict in the war against the Gallic in Scotland. Further throughout the film we one time once more see Elizabeth call of her proposed matrimony due to the public assistance of her people once she had seen her hubby to be dressed as a adult females. Elizabeth does claim at one phase that she “ can inherit her male parent – she ‘s merely a adult females, but can take to hold the bosom of a adult male to do her determinations ” .

The original statement from Covey will hold been proven true by Elizabeth as her qualities are consistent with coveys claim. She portrayed ageless rules within her character.

Bibliography

Rabey, G. 2003, ” The paradox of teamwork ” , Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 35 Iodine: 4 pp. 158- 162

West, M. 2000, “ Effective Teamwork ” . 2nd Edt. Great Britain: The British Psychological Society.

Covey, S.R. 1992, “ Principle-Centered Leadership ” . Firside: Simon and Schuster.

Introduction

This essay will guise in item the leading competences Queen Elizabeth portrayed in the 1998 film based on her opinion of England. The pupils take parting chose the competencies they believed Elizabeth best exhibit during the film. The competences observed where ; Communication, Flexibility, Team Work, Ethics, Sarah and Angela ‘s portion here ( ****** )

Elizabeth was the half sister of Queen Mary of England which both shared the same male parent, Henry VIII. Mary became terminally sick with malignant neoplastic disease and finally became asleep. She had no kids of her ain to go through the thrown onto so Elizabeth was following in line to go Queen. At that clip of 1554 there was a great divide amongst Catholics and Protestants. Queen Elizabeth had to take the uncertainness of England.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *