Evaluation Of Fountas And Pinnell Benchmark System English Language Essay

The Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System, created by Irene Fountas and Gay Su Pinnell ( Placeholder2 ) , is designed to put pupils suitably into a guided reading plan, show the additions in pupil accomplishment, advancement monitoring and identify pupils in demand of intercession ( those who are non run intoing the territory ‘s proficiency degrees ) . In short, it relates reading ability. The sub-contents addressed include: Word Analysis Skills, Reading Strategies, Groking Reading Materials, Literary Elementss and Techniques and Literary Works.

The trial consists chiefly of running records, in which the instructor records unwritten eloquence, reading mistakes and self-correction ratios. In add-on, it is followed by a retelling and comprehension conversation between the pupil and instructor. Finally a authorship prompt ( optional ) is given to the pupil. In the scene where I am straight working with the Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark, it is required that all pupils to finish the authorship prompt. The trial is administered in kindergarten through 8th class at the terminal of each one-fourth. The appraisal normally takes 20 to thirty proceedingss. The appraisal could take longer if more than one benchmark is needed to happen the appropriate degree.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System allows the pedagogue to utilize the information obtained in a assortment of ways. The appraisal ‘s waies suggest that the administer find three degrees of text trouble to find the pupil ‘s difficult, instructional and independent degrees. This process of happening all three degrees may change depending on the school or territory demand for quarterly benchmark degrees. The information is so used to find a pupil ‘s guided reading degree, to make a focal point for direction or end for the pupil, and to find text degree for independent reading. In add-on, the appraisal identifies pupil ‘s who are falling below territory proficiencies and who may necessitate extra services. ( Resnick & A ; Hampton, 2009 )

The Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment can be used for province, territory, school and schoolroom informations aggregation. This information can assist to find instructional alterations in the schoolroom and professional development needed for pedagogues. ADD more here ( Fountas & A ; Pinnell, 2007, cited in www.heinemann.com )

In add-on to an truth per centum, reading rate, self-correction rate and eloquence mark, the appraisal has a “ Comprehension Conversation ” that completes the appraisal processs. Students are required to read a text and to hold this comprehension conversation, with specific prompts to find the pupil ‘s ability to “ Thinking Within the Text ( acquiring the actual significance by treating words and stated thoughts ) , Thinking Beyond the Text ( acquiring the implied significance and synthesising information ) and Thinking About the Text ( reacting to the writer ‘s trade ) . ” ( Placeholder1 ) ( Fountas & A ; Pinnell, 2007, cited in www.heinemann.com ) The content that is covered in the benchmark includes reading truth, reading comprehension, reading eloquence and self-correction ratio. This is similar to the informal appraisals being given to pupils through- out a literacy block in a reading workshop attack.

This appraisal can be used both formatively and summatively. It is a “ standardised, teacher-administered, one-on-one appraisal ; hand-scored by the instructor ” . ( Fountas & A ; Pinnell, 2007, cited in www.heinemann.com ) The appraisal should be administered by the schoolroom instructor, after they have been trained to administrate the trial which will diminish the happening of errors in disposal and ease standardised consequences. A picture is provided to see for staff development or single instructor screening. This can assist to guarantee that the appraisal is delivered in a standardised manner.

The BAS ( Benchmark Assessment System ) addresses five countries addressed by the National Reading Panel ( Placeholder3 ) as “ cardinal to student success in literacy acquisition ” are assessed in the BAS. These countries include phonological consciousness, phonics, vocabulary, eloquence, and comprehension. The appraisal besides addresses pupil motive and involvement in overall reading. Harmonizing to the official field study papers of the appraisal,

The field informations were collected consistently and analyzed on an on-going footing to find the plan ‘s accomplishment of its aims. Reports were so developed, and used as a footing for finding the soundness, complexnesss, and public-service corporation of the plan. The procedure of integrating ongoing feedback gathered by field-tests testers, the plan writers and developers made informed determinations sing accommodations and polishs. At the decision of the field survey, an independent data-analysis squad was brought in to measure the appraisal ‘s dependability and cogency. This formative research was conducted in two stages. Phase I of the survey addressed research inquiries 1 and 2 ; Phase II addressed research inquiry 3. Prior to the formative rating, an column procedure was used to set up the text grading.

Field proving included a sum of 497 pupils crossing classs K-8. Field proving of System 1 included 252 pupils and System 2 included 245 pupils. School sites from which these pupils were drawn were socioeconomically, ethnically, and geographically diverse. The research end was to place “ typical pupils. ” Consequently, pupils were selected on the footing of their ability to read and understand texts that were written about at grade degree or supra. Participants were besides adept talkers of English.

Each field trial tester determined an single pupil ‘s eligibility after discoursing his or her reading profile with their several instructors. Thirteen field-test testers were selected. All field-test testers were pedagogues who had extended preparation in administrating running records and in utilizing other signifiers of benchmark appraisals to measure pupils ‘ reading degrees. Field-test testers were non affiliated with the field sites and therefore could be nonsubjective in both identifying pupils and in administrating appraisals. Prior to the beginning of the field testing, a two-day intensive preparation session led by the writers, guided the field-test testers in the formative rating ‘s protocols and processs. A sum of 22 different schools participated in field testing of either System 1 or System 2 ( some schools participated in both field trials ) . Field proving took topographic point across the undermentioned geographic parts of the United States: Boston Metropolitan country 1 tester ; 1 school / Providence, Rhode Island 1 tester ; 2 schools / Houston Metropolitan country 2 testers ; 5 schools / Los Angeles country 4 testers ; 6 schools / Columbus, OH, country 3 testers ; 5 schools / Orlando, FL, country 2 testers ; 3 schools. ( Field Study of Reliability and Validity of the Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment Systems 1 and 2 ) . ( Fountas and Pinnell, 2011, pp. 2-3 )

Assessment Appearance and Content

The appraisal includes two options of books for each level- “ System 1 ( Grades K-2, Levels A-N ) contains 28 Books ( 14 Fiction and 14 Nonfiction ) and System 2 ( Grades 3-8, Levels L-Z ) contains 30 Books ( 15 Fiction and 15 Nonfiction ) . The degrees of the Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment are described as a, “ aˆ¦ gradient is a defined continuum of features related to the degree of support and challenges that a reader meets in a text. At each degree ( A to Z ) texts are analyzed utilizing 10 features: ( 1 ) genre/form ; ( 2 ) text construction ; ( 3 ) content ; ( 4 ) subjects and thoughts ; ( 5 ) linguistic communication and literary characteristics ; ( 6 ) sentence complexness ; ( 7 ) vocabulary ; ( 8 ) word trouble ; ( 9 ) illustrations/graphics ; and ( 10 ) book and print characteristics. ” Texts are leveled utilizing a extremely dependable procedure in which squads of trained instructors, working independently and so through consensus, delegate a degree to books after analysing them harmonizing to the 10 factors. They are so analyzed by Fountas and Pinnell. The benchmark books were really created to exactly fit the gradient, and they were independently analyzed utilizing the same procedure. ” ( Resnick & A ; Hampton, 2009 )

The Assessment Guide to the BAS describes the disposal of the appraisal as follows:

The pupil ‘s appropriate reading degree for the appraisal to be administered is based in the pupil ‘s current guided reading degree, or can be determined by a “ Where to Get down ” word list that was developed by the writers to help testers in rapidly puting a pupil at his or her appropriate reading degree. Following, the administer is to measure the pupil ‘s ability to read and grok three degrees of books. They are to find one book that is easy – the pupil ‘s independent reading degree ; one book that offered merely plenty hard vocabulary and/or constructs to do the reading interesting and disputing – , the pupil ‘s instructional reading degree ; and a 3rd book that was excessively ambitious – the pupil ‘s difficult reading degree. Accuracy of reading guidelines, consistent with Fountas and Pinnell ‘s model ( 2006b ) , is as follows: independent degree ( 95-100 per centum truth ) ; instructional degree ( 90-94 per centum truth ) , and difficult degree ( below 90 per centum truth ) . ( Fountas & A ; Pinnell, 2007, pp. 180-181 )

The appraisal should be given in the schoolroom or other familiar scene. A moderately quiet and comfy environment is necessary so that distractions do non interfere with the appraisal. All stuffs should be ready to travel accessible to the instructor, so that the appraisal may run swimmingly with few distractions. If the pupil seems to be acquiring frustrated after reading one or two texts, it may be necessary to halt the appraisal and Begin at a ulterior clip.

Each of the countries assessed relates to the content and sub-content ( in assorted degrees ) taught to kindergarten through 8th grade pupils during their literacy block. The BAS lets the decision maker think about, buttocks and place a assortment of different accomplishments and strategies the reader may hold strengths or shortages in. “ It is designed to mensurate advancement in each of the sub-skills in a manner that informs direction. It is linked to a continuum of discernible behaviours to measure and learn for at every degree. ” ( Fountas & A ; Pinnell, 2007 ) Each instructor in classs kindergarten through 8th class has a transcript of the continuum. The assessment format is similar to the informal appraisals ( running records and confabulating with readers ) used in the schoolroom. These informal appraisals are used sporadically throughout the one-fourth. The Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System does necessitate a more in-depth conversation than traditional schoolroom conferences.

The pupil ‘s eloquence degree is besides assessed utilizing the undermentioned standards: Readers phrase or group words, through modulation, emphasis, and intermissions. They emphasize the beginnings and terminations of phrases by the rise and falling of pitch or by hesitating. Students adhere to “ the writer ‘s sentence structure or sentence construction, reflecting their comprehension. Readers are expressive ; their reading reflects feeling, expectancy, and character development. ” Once a pupil ‘s instructional reading degree is determined, the pupil is engaged in a comprehension conversation about that peculiar book. If pupils are unresponsive or give an uncomplete response, pedagogues may motivate them harmonizing to a preset set of inquiries. Following, the instructor rates the pupil ‘s apprehension of a text utilizing the Fountas and Pinnell comprehension guidelines. The countries are rated on a graduated table from 0-3: Thinking within the text, believing beyond the text and believing about the text.

Measuring the Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System

A reappraisal of the benchmark appraisal shows no prejudice towards persons or groups based on race, ethnicity, gender or disablements. Students with disablements are given the appraisal that aligns with their single advancement along the literacy continuum and text gradient for the reader. At times, when the eloquence degree is timed, an pedagogue may observe on the side specific address issues. All other adjustments as mandated by their IEPs are allowed. The appraisal is used to find reading ability, hence, pupils with IEPs necessitating that trial be read for certain circumstance are non allowed this adjustment for the benchmark. The diction and content of the benchmark appraisal is predominately age and class appropriate. However, for pupils reading highly below their age or rate degree equals, the text may look immature for their age. The gradient degrees of trouble of the text chosen for the appraisal were carefully thought out and field tested.

I feel the content cogency of the Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System can be improved by adding a more strict demand in the composing about reading country. I do non experience that one prompt adequately demo how a pupil can compose about reading. In add-on, I feel that as pupils move into the older classs, that comprehension should be judged more on the pupils composing about the text than a comprehension conversation. One other country of the appraisal could be improved. There are merely two books, one fiction and one nonfiction, at each degree. This does non give pedagogues much room for mistake or particular instruction instructors room to reevaluate at a similar degree, placing strengths in a peculiar sub-content and non merely text degree gradient.

There is at least one point per mark, with some points holding more than one point per mark. Some of the sub-content countries did non hold a mark for each taxonomy degree, but with farther probe ( into the upper class Benchmark Assessment, perchance ) it would most likely screen each taxonomy degree. In add-on, each point does belong on the appraisal and relates to a specific sub-content area/taxonomy degree. The Illinois Reading Standards addressed include: 1.A.1b Comprehend unfamiliar words utilizing context hints and anterior cognition ; verify significances with resource stuffs, 1.B.1c Continuously cheque and clear up for understanding ( e.g. , reread, read in front, use ocular and context hints, ask inquiries, retell, use meaningful permutations ) , 1.B.2d Read age-appropriate stuff aloud with eloquence and truth, 1.C.2b Make and support illations and organize readings about chief subjects and subjects, 1.C.2d Summarize and do generalisations from content and relate to aim of stuff, 1.C.2e Explain how writers and illustrators use text and art to show their thoughts ( e.g. , points of position, design chromaticities, metaphor ) , 1.C.1f Use information presented in simple tabular arraies, maps and charts to organize an reading, 2.A.2b Describe how literary elements ( e.g. , subject, character, puting, secret plan, tone, struggle ) are used in literature to make significance and 2.B.1a Respond to literary stuffs by linking them to their ain experience and communicate those responses to others. ( Illinois State Board of Education, 1997 )

Classroom Assessment Blueprint and Learning Targets

The schoolroom appraisal design and the list of larning marks appear below. Assessment points and the figure of the associated acquisition mark are included in the design.

Remembering

Understanding

Using

Analyzing

Measuring

Making

Entire

Targets

Word Analysis Skills

1. Identify the significance of unfamiliar words utilizing anterior cognition

2. Detect the significance of unfamiliar words utilizing context hints.

22. Proctors ain apprehension and truth.

20. Constructs actual significance of the text through work outing words.

4

Reading Schemes

4. Reads chiefly in larger, meaningful phrases or word groups.

23. Predicts information about the text.

5. Demonstrates eloquence by reading utilizing largely smooth, expressive reading and pausing guided by writer ‘s significance and punctuation.

3. Assess and clear up for understanding ( e.g. , reread, read in front, use ocular and context hints, ask inquiries, retell, and utilize meaningful permutations ) .

4

Comprehend Reading Materials

6. Remember thoughts by mention to inside informations in the text.

18. Identify the chief thoughts and back uping inside informations of a narrative or fiction transition.

9. Sum up a narrative or non-fiction transition.

19. Demonstrate first-class apprehension of the text through summarizing. ( Includes about all of import information and chief thoughts. )

10. Demonstrate apprehension of characters in a narrative or non-fiction transition ( i.e. through retell ) .

11. Identify connexions with anterior cognition or personal experiences.

25. Infers what is implied but non stated in the text.

22. Proctors ain apprehension and truth.

** Two places**

17. State the chief thought of a non-fiction paragraph.

27. Write a response about the reading ( from given prompt ) .

10

Literary Elementss and Techniques

7. Specify puting in a narrative or fiction transition.

8. Recall sequence of events.

12. Sum up the major events in a narrative.

29. Show an apprehension of the trade and construction of a text ( literary linguistic communication, narrative construction, position, etc. ) .

16. Distinguish elements of the writer ‘s trade.

30. Support cognition and thoughts ( and move on them ) to include one ‘s thought by composing in response to text

15. Construct chronological sequence of events after reading a narrative or fiction transition.

7

Literary Works

24. Identify cardinal inside informations when sum uping a narrative or non-fiction transition.

28. Remember and describe cardinal thoughts and inside informations from texts, including understanding characters.

13. Indicate out the writer ‘s intent.

14. Interpret how the writer ‘s purpose affects the reading of the reading choice.

26. Tells new information by synthesising and altering ain thoughts.

5

Learning Targets

Students will be able to:

1. Identify the significance of unfamiliar words utilizing anterior cognition.

2. Detect the significance of unfamiliar words utilizing context hints.

3. Assess and clear up for understanding ( e.g. , reread, read in front, use ocular and context hints, ask inquiries, retell, and utilize meaningful permutations ) .

4. Reads chiefly in larger, meaningful phrases or word groups.

5. Demonstrates eloquence by reading utilizing largely smooth, expressive reading and pausing guided by writer ‘s significance and punctuation.

6. Remember thoughts by mention to inside informations in the text.

7. Specify puting in a narrative or fiction transition.

8. Recall sequence of events.

9. Sum up a narrative or non-fiction transition.

10. Demonstrate apprehension of characters in a narrative or non-fiction transition ( i.e. through retell ) .

11. Identify connexions with anterior cognition or personal experiences.

12. Sum up the major events in a narrative.

13. Indicate out the writer ‘s intent.

14. Interpret how the writer ‘s purpose affects the reading of the reading choice.

15. Construct chronological sequence of events after reading a narrative or fiction transition.

16. Distinguish elements of the writer ‘s trade.

17. State the chief thought of a non-fiction paragraph.

18. Identify the chief thoughts and back uping inside informations of a narrative or fiction transition.

19. Demonstrate first-class apprehension of the text through summarizing. ( Includes about all of import information and chief thoughts. )

20. Constructs actual significance of the text through work outing words.

22. Proctors ain apprehension and truth.

23. Predicts information about the text.

24. Identify cardinal inside informations when sum uping a narrative or non-fiction transition.

25. Infers what is implied but non stated in the text.

26. Tells new information by synthesising and altering ain thoughts.

27. Write a response about the reading ( from given prompt ) .

28. Remember and describe cardinal thoughts and inside informations from texts, including understanding characters.

29. Show an apprehension of the trade and construction of a text ( literary linguistic communication, narrative construction, position, etc. ) .

30. Support cognition and thoughts ( and move on them ) to include one ‘s thought by composing in response to text.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *