Film Analysis Of A Beautiful Mind English Literature Essay

A Beautiful MindA is about the life of John Nash, the mathematical mastermind, a fable by the age of 30 when he slipped intoA schizophrenic disorder, and who – thanks to the altruistic devotedness of his married woman and the go oning backing of mathematics community- emerged after a brainsick life to win a Nobel Prize in 1994 and universe acclamation. The film, is based on the book which is in a biographical manner which has won the congratulations of 100s, is already a victor of several esteemed awards amongst which that stand out are National Books Critical Circle forA BiographyA and Pulitzer Prize inA Biography.A A Now, the book is a major Gesture Picture that has already bagged the Oscar for this twelvemonth.

The film is about the life narrative of John Forbes Nash, Jr. – a mathematical mastermind and discoverer of a theory of rational behaviorA for which he was awarded a Nobel Prize in 1994. The book is written in a biographical manner in five parts, get downing with a Prologue. The portion one is on A Beautiful Mind, Part two on Separate Lifes, Part three on A Slow Fire Burning, Part four on The Lost Years, and the Part five on The Most Worthy, followed by Epilogue, Notes, Select Bibliography, Acknowledgements, and Index, The latter characteristics non merely supply an appropriate support to so aerationA but besides makes it a referenced biographical sketch.A As Sylvia Nasser, the superb writer of the book concludes the Prologue ; she ends by stating that “ This is the narrative of John Forbes Nash, Jr. It is a narrative about the enigma of the human head, in three Acts of the Apostless, mastermind, lunacy, reawakening. ” The writer excels non merely inA narrationA manner but besides in her capableness in doing the manner absorbing – steeping the reader wholly in the profusion of the narrative ‘s presentation. The Prologue starts the flowering of the narrative by showing rich information about John Forbes Nash, Jr. , as other famous persons knew him – the several aspects of hisA personality, particularly those that were taking him into his madness.A Showing a word picture ofA schizophrenic disorder, writer helps in informing the reader about the fortunes under which a spontaneousA recoveryA from this dementing and degenerative disease believed to be so rare, became a possibility for John Nash. In Epilogue, the writer narrates such events in John Nash ‘s life, which validates hisA recovery from this lunacy. It besides raises a inquiry for the Psychiatrists and the Clinical Psychologists that given a personalityA like that of John Forbes Nash, Jr. , what is the chance ofA recoveryA from the schizophrenic lunacy for another person?

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

A

The Beautiful Mind.

The manager has given the film the rubric ofA A Beautiful Mind. There must hold been really strong grounds to make so and are certainly in mention to the profusion ofA behaviorA that John Forbes Nash Jr. showed during the full span of his life – from mastermind to being a schizophrenic and to re-awakening. The author’sA narrationA of hisA behaviorA stands out to show this facet of his life. For illustration:

“ His coevalss, on the whole, found him vastly strange. ” They found him as “ aloof, ” “ haughty, ” “ without affect, ” “ detached, ” “ spooky, ” “ isolated, ” andA ” fagot, ” Nash mingled instead than assorted with his equals. Pre-occupied with his ain private world, he seemed non to portion their mundane concerns. His manners – somewhat cold, a spot superior, slightly close – suggested something “ cryptic and unnatural ” . His farness was punctuated by flights of garrulity about outer infinite and geo-political tendencies, infantile buffooneries, and unpredictable eruption of choler. But these effusions were, more frequently than non, every bit puzzling as his silences. aˆ¦ “

“ By his late mid-twentiess, Nash ‘s penetrations and finds had won him acknowledgment, regard, and liberty. He had carved a superb calling at the vertex of the mathematics profession, traveled, lectured, taught, met the most celebrated mathematicians of his twenty-four hours, and become celebrated himself. aˆ¦ ”

“ Nash proved a tragic exclusion. Underneath the superb surface of his life, all was pandemonium and contradiction: his engagements with other work forces ; a secret kept woman and a ignored bastard boy ; and a persistent fright of failure, aˆ¦ ”

“ While Nash the adult male frozen in a dreamlike province, a apparition who haunted Princeton in the 1970s and 80s, scrabbling on the chalkboards and analyzing spiritual texts, his name began to come up everywhere- in economic sciences text editions, articles on evolutionary biological science, political scientific discipline treatises, mathematics diaries. aˆ¦ ”

“ At 70 three John expressions and sounds wondrous good. He feels progressively certain that he wo n’t endure a backsliding. “ It is like a uninterrupted procedure instead than merely waking up from a dream, he told aA New York TimesA newsman late. aˆ¦ ”

A

This is merely a sampling of hisA behaviorA picturing diverseness of different orders as he treaded his life way. The film has legion illustrations of this diverseness, spread over all the manner until the last. It is this largeA behaviorA discrepancy that possibly motivated the manager to make up one’s mind to give the movie the rubric ofA A Beautiful Mind.

A

MY Reappraisal: –

As a psychological science pupil who has spent 1000s of hours speaking about mentally sick people, I was eager to see “ A Beautiful Mind ” . I wanted to see if this would be the really first film of all time to portray people with schizophrenic unwellness in a sympathetic visible radiation, to avoid the usual stereotypes such as “ truly chilling psychotic slayer ” or “ impossibly eldritch bag individual ”

As portrayed in “ A Beautiful Mind ” , John Nash is one chilling fellow. From the scene where he about lets his infant boy drown because he is convinced that his delusional friend Charles is watching the baby while Nash is elsewhere, to the 1 in which he really about assail his married woman in response to a voice stating him she is out to acquire him, the movie portrays Nash as a adult male who at any minute can traverse over the line to where his delusional thoughts create existent calamities.

But seting aside my ain docket, I would hold to state that the film has unusual strengths, thanks to masterful public presentations by Russell Crowe as John Nash, and by Jennifer Connelly as his married woman Alicia.

Crowe gives a subtle and beautiful public presentation, and he really about pulls it off. Surely he is good plenty in the function that I ne’er one time thought “ gladiator ” . His John Nash word picture has many sides – the distressingly uncomfortable boy-man at Princeton, the sardonic humourist, the deservedly chesty professional mathematician, the frightened, pathetic receiver of the full onslaught of psychotically imagined auditory hallucinations – and these word pictures about work. But the immature Nash, although a standout flake in his early alumnus surveies, is non truly eldritch plenty to portray the alienation that must hold been his batch as, in the thick of intense originative attempts, he was already fighting with a delusional system he could non ever separate from world. And even in the throes of his worst psychotic incubuss, when he lashes out at the physician who comes to step in on his behalf, he is excessively contained. But what Crowe does acquire right in the public presentation is a batch. Somehow he has managed to larn the peculiar and extremely idiosyncratic position and pace that many people with schizophrenia show and which is unmistakable to the trained oculus. Particularly nice, I thought, was how Crowe ‘s Nash could retrieve from deadly societal faux pas with speedy humor and appeal, as for illustration during his visit back at Princeton where he is inquiring the new section president ( and his old Nemesis from graduate school ) if he might return to the campus to learn. In the thick of their conversation, Nash is convulsed by his psychotic belief, and lashes out at an imagined presence. He so turns to the startled president and asks, “ Is there any manner that you could bury what I merely did? ”

As Alicia, Jennifer Connelly gives a traveling public presentation as Nash ‘s once and future married woman. Falling in love with a adult male who can happen everything in the starry heavens, and who knows the existence is infinite, she is rapidly disillusioned as he succumbs to an unwellness which was even more of a expletive in 1954 than it is today. She withstands seeing her hubby subjected to tonss of ghastly insulin daze “ interventions ” and subsequently, when he is place from the infirmary, has to postulate with his backdown, deficiency of fondness, and originative daze, partly side effects of the drug Thorazine, which was the lone utile intervention manner back so. When Nash recognizes the drug ‘s hurtful effects on himself and stops the medicine, he is rapidly thrust back into the panic. Nevertheless, in the film at least, she stands by her adult male. She comforts him when she can, and confronts him when she must, and bit by bit he begins to come out of the unwellness. Some may experience that the relationship of John and Alicia was the smaltziest portion of this film, the least isomorphous function from any of John Nash ‘s existent life to the universe of the Ag screen. But to me it was the most existent, because I have seen how of import such a relationship is to a individual fighting to emerge from mental unwellness. Following to the medicine, it counts for everything.

I saw this film with the my friend who is working at the mental wellness center.. We spent a long clip afterwards speaking about it. She said something I thought was peculiarly true. She said, “ What Ron Howard has done is to give us a film non about a “ schizophrenic ” , as if the term “ schizophrenic ” defined the individual, but about a individual who happens to hold the unwellness schizophrenic disorder. ”

Possibly people are ready to understand that, in the words of the iconoclastic hero of American psychopathology Harry Stack Sullivan, “ Peoples with schizophrenic disorder are much more human than otherwise. ” I ‘ve had some familiarity on a personal degree with friends and household who ‘ve experienced mental unwellness — both bi-polar unwellness ( normally called passion or manic-depressive unwellness ) and schizophrenic disorder. After first seeing the film and so reading Sylvia Nasar ‘s book, I have really assorted emotions about both. The chief “ true ” thing which comes through in either version — is that schizophrenics do sometimes retrieve, or experience long periods of “ remittal ” as the book describes it. Cardinal to this, many times, is the support of household and acknowledgment of professional co-workers. In Nash ‘s instance, many many co-workers were exceptionally tolerant and caring — something more underscored in the book. The film makes Nash ‘s married woman the chief hero, field and simple, in his recovery. The books paints a much more varied and racy narrative of life with his married woman, his kept woman, his boies ( one by his married woman, one by his kept woman ) — and of his homosexual affairs which were besides cardinal to his life-long journey towards going nicer or more human and humane. The book contains a wealth of item — much of it about Nash ‘s coevalss instead than about his ain life ; I ‘d state you acquire about one-third Nash, two-thirds Nash ‘s familiarities and company. It ‘s impossible to compose a life, of class, without giving background inside informations. But Nasar had great trouble doing both Nash ‘s personality and his alleged “ Beautiful Mind ” comprehendible or appealing. A batch of what he did and thought was more ugly than beautiful. A different rubric would hold helped greatly, I think. Anyway, Nasar ‘s manner of get bying with composing about Nash himself was to take safety in depicting those around him who were less successful but easier to depict, or who were more utmost in personality or who achieved greater acclamation before he did. She wants to demo that he, to some extent, ranks with the greatest minds of any clip — people like Nicola Tesla, Einstein, Pascal. This may be true, and when she showed how Nash sought to near the truly baffling jobs, particularly those considered of import by many people — it works. But Nasar is awful at explicating math in its specifics or in general. She does little better with the relationship between math and applied-math Fieldss which so frequently involved Nash straight or ended up being of import to the application of what he ‘d originated as alleged pure mathematics. I was ready to forgive the film for this — and while it gives merely a suggestion of the math involved, at least it does this well, even exceptionally — but non the book. There are close to one-hundred pages of notes at the terminal of Nasar ‘s books — and seeking those beginnings is the lone hope for those intrigued by Nash ‘s achievements or countries of research. The best “ narrative ” of the book, the lone portion well-narrated, comes near the terminal, and involves the Baronial Prize and the battle between the Noble commission members over taking Nash. It ‘s a great narrative. In the book, after it becomes clear Nash has shown marks of retrieving from schizophrenic disorder, a slow and steady patterned advance over 10 or twenty old ages — Nasar raises the inquiry of whether Nash might hold been misdiagnosed as schizophrenic. No 1 recovers from schizophrenic disorder, particularly without drugs — that ‘s what people used to believe, many still do — and both book and film reference this belief. Manic-depression, nevertheless, is known to frequently be well-controlled with medicines. I ‘ve had indirect contact with manic-depressives and relations of them, much more so than with schizophrenics — to me there ‘s no inquiry that Nash was non a manic-depressive. On the other manus, from all indicants, Nash was person who suffered, at times badly, from schizophrenic disorder, with paranoid psychotic beliefs. The paranoid component of his unwellness may be to some grade realistically and imaginatively treated in the film. Where the film strays really far from the truth, in a kind of Disney manner, is in the creative activity of his fanciful college roomie and so subsequently with the roomie ‘s cunning small girl who ne’er ages. Nash ne’er had any hallucinations or psychotic beliefs of that kind ; he imagined foreigners were pass oning with him, and felt he ‘d gained cognition which would assist universe leaders, presidents and Prime Ministers, and even sought to pass on with the Pope. He did nip headlines from newspapers and magazines, as the film depicts — in connexion with this paranoid-delusional compulsion. The character of the roomie is well-acted, nevertheless ; I personally felt it was an first-class public presentation. But, be that as it may, particularly with the add-on of the roommate’eone with schizophrenic disorder — I had a feeling schizophrenics and their households would happen those sequences of the movie violative or merely laughably untrue to life.. the film departs in some big ways from the existent events of Nash ‘s life, and bloopers severely with the apparition roomie component — it ‘s still a great movie. Great films and great books frequently do hold bloopers, sometimes serious 1s, or weak subdivisions. In this instance, I think the film particularly can be forgiven its mistakes and deformations because of the challenge of portraying such hard topics. By that I mean non merely Nash himself, as a personality, but more loosely the subjects of advanced mathematics and schizophrenic disorder. Second, it does hold its bosom in the right topographic point — the patient and loving attention of household and friends can play a major function in assisting mentally-ill people ( non to except the function of physicians and medical interventions ) . Finally, I think it ‘s an extraordinary public presentation by Russell Crowe. He ‘s better in “ The Insider ” — but from the all-too-little of what Nash was truly similar in address and in personal idiosyncrasies which does at times come through in Nasar ‘s book — Crowe ‘s portraiture has elements of mastermind. Surely the scriptwriter deserves acknowledgment, here, excessively — since the book provides chiefly the movie ‘s rubric and small in the manner of duologue or coherent narrative push. .

Decision: –

This has got to be one of the best movies I have of all time seen! I was ne’er a large Russell Crowe fan to get down with, but this movie has made me into a convert. Hats off to Ron Howard for making such a brilliant occupation! This film has made such an feeling on me and even after watching it, I can non assist but believe about it and am extremely urging it to all my friends

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *