The Characterization Of The Titular Characters English Literature Essay

In the dramas Medea by Euripides, and Hedda Gabler by Henrik Ibsen, the two dramatists utilize the word picture of the titular characters for knowing literary effects. During Euripides ‘ clip, adult females lived in a patriarchal society, and were denied citizenship position, and Euripides portrays Medea as an unconventional, monstrous adult female to knock the inequality of the sexes in Grecian society. Similarly, in the Victorian-era, the ideal adult female was expected to be “ the angel in the house ” [[ 1 ]] , “ devoted and submissive ” [[ 2 ]] , and Ibsen ‘s portraiture of Hedda as an untypical adult female trapped by the outlooks of society is used to knock the resistance to the outgrowth of the ‘new adult female ‘ [[ 3 ]] . While Medea is characterized utilizing her words and workss to show Euripides ‘ positions on adult females in society, Hedda is characterized through Ibsen ‘s usage of actions and address to demo the consequence that social force per unit area has on adult females in society.

In Medea, Medea is portrayed as an irregular adult female through her address. Through this, Euripides demonstrates Medea ‘s passionate nature and her feminist positions, unconventional traits in a adult female during that period. In Grecian society, adult females were expected to postpone to her hubby ‘s authorization in all affairs, including divorce. When a adult male wished to disassociate his married woman, the adult female was expected to merely accept the divorce, and this is seen from the words of the adult females of Corinth: “ You must n’t take so hard the loss of the hubby ” [[ 4 ]] , demoing how adult females in that epoch passively accepted divorce. Medea, in contrast, refuses to accept Jason ‘s treachery, and returns to take retaliation, wishing to kill those “ who dared to make [ her ] harm ” [[ 5 ]] , and to hold “ [ Jason and Creon ‘s girl ] obliterated, / burnt to decease in their ain places ” . [[ 6 ]] Such menaces shows Medea ‘s passionate nature, and her surplus of emotions. Not merely does her address show her passionate nature, it besides shows Medea ‘s radical positions, in peculiar her extremist women’s rightist thoughts. Medea, an mercantile establishment for the concerns and frights of the Greek adult female, discusses how work forces believe “ [ adult females have ] a nice, easy lifeaˆ¦ Safe at place when [ work forces are ] off contending ” [[ 7 ]] , yet, she would “ contend three wars instead than give birth one time ” [[ 8 ]] . Besides, she calls matrimony “ an auction / Where [ adult females ] wage to give away [ their ] organic structures ” [[ 9 ]] . Medea ‘s feminist positions are clearly expressed through these quotation marks, knocking the inequality between work forces and adult females, oppugning the right for work forces to hold such control and power over adult females. Through Medea ‘s address, Euripides has portrayed Medea as a passionate women’s rightist, one who fights for her rights because of the unfairnesss she has suffered at the custodies of work forces.

Similarly, in Hedda Gabler, Ibsen uses Hedda ‘s words to portray her as an unconventional ‘new adult female ‘ , who has “ independent demands on lifeaˆ¦ assert their personalityaˆ¦ [ and battles ] for their rights as representatives of their sex ” [[ 10 ]] . While the Victorian adult female was expected to be submissive and “ [ love ] with love that can non pall ” [[ 11 ]] , Hedda is shown to loathe the construct of love. When Brack talks about love with Hedda, she replies, “ do n’t utilize that sickly, stupid word. “ [[ 12 ]] Similarly, when Brack discusses maternity, she states that she “ [ has ] no propensities in that way ” [[ 13 ]] , and that she “ [ does non ] want any – duties. “ [[ 14 ]] Her words show her arrant antipathy for love, particularly child-bearing, an untypical trait for a adult female in the Victorian-era. In add-on, Hedda besides displays aspiration, as she expresses her desire to “ carry Tesman to travel into political relations ” [[ 15 ]] , and to go her life of “ deplorable poorness ” [[ 16 ]] . Through address, Ibsen has portrayed Hedda as a adult female out of the ordinary, a “ new adult female ” who is different from the typical adult female of that epoch.

Besides words, actions are besides used by Euripides to qualify Medea as an unconventional adult female, demoing her to be monstrous and warrior-like, critical features for Medea to possess to guarantee she is able to prevail over Jason. Medea ‘s barbarian nature allows her to orchestrate the blackwash of Creon and his girl, poisoning them to decease. Most disturbing, nevertheless, is Medea ‘s ability to “ pull a blade and dip it / Into [ Jason and Medea ‘s ] kids ” [[ 17 ]] . This act, of which “ No offense ‘s more monstrous ” [[ 18 ]] , is Medea ‘s ultimate retaliation on Jason, prevailing, as a adult female over adult male. Medea ‘s monstrous nature is necessary for her to stand up against the mistreatment of adult females in Grecian society and accomplish absolute triumph.

Ibsen besides utilizes actions in Hedda Gabler to make the conditions for Hedda ‘s ruin. In the drama, Hedda is an unconventional ‘new adult female ‘ who maintains the facade of a traditional Victorian-era adult female, careful non to make anything that would ask for dirt. For illustration, Hedda marries Tesman entirely because it is what society expects of her. When asked the ground why she married, Hedda admits that she married Tesman because “ he ‘s a really respectable adult male ” [[ 19 ]] , with “ nil precisely pathetic about him ” [[ 20 ]] . Therefore, we see Hedda ‘s great fright of dirt, which finally is one of the make up one’s minding factors in her self-destruction.

Therefore, both Euripides and Ibsen have utilized word picture of Medea and Hedda to portray their unconventional features, and this is indispensable to raise inquiries about of import issues in their several societies. Medea ‘s word picture as a women’s rightist is used by Euripides to discourse the controversial issue of equality amongst sexes. Medea ‘s women’s rightist ideals, every bit good as her passionate nature are necessary for Medea to lift up against social conventions. No ordinary adult female would make bold to make the things she did, and her nature is critical in order for her actions to be credible. However, passion is non plenty, for Medea can non prevail without destructing Jason, and her monstrous nature is quintessential in order to absolutely get the better of Jason. To accomplish this, Medea must make “ that which will ache Jason most ” [[ 21 ]] – killing his boies. However, the act of infanticide is monstrous, gross outing even to the adult females of Corinth who ab initio supported Medea ‘s retaliation. “ This destructive, deadly adult female / planning infanticide ” [[ 22 ]] , “ Stop her, / Hold her dorsum ” [[ 23 ]] , says the Chorus, opposing Medea when they ab initio urged her to “ Pay [ Jason ] back / That ‘s merely just ” [[ 24 ]] . Therefore, Medea ‘s passionate nature leads her to lift up against the unfairnesss she suffered, while her monstrous nature allows her to kill her ain kids, finishing her retaliation upon Jason. Ultimately, Medea ‘s battle for equality amongst work forces and adult females, particularly in footings of equal rights in matrimony, show Euripides ‘ unfavorable judgments of the subordination of adult females to work forces in Grecian society, and his belief in the equality of the sexes is accentuated by Medea ‘s victory.

Similarly, in Hedda Gabler, Hedda ‘s portraiture as a ‘new adult female ‘ who is trapped by the force per unit areas of society is used by Ibsen to knock the resistance towards this new trade name of adult female. Hedda ‘s portraiture as a ‘new adult female ‘ is critical, as it is merely by portraying the tragic predicament of a ‘new adult female ‘ that Ibsen is able to notice, or knock issues associating to it. In add-on, Hedda ‘s great fright of dirt is another of import trait that contributes towards Ibsen ‘s commentary. As Loevborg says, Hedda is “ a coward at bosom ” [[ 25 ]] , and she agrees with him, naming herself “ A awful coward. “ [[ 26 ]] Hedda ‘s fright of dirt, conflicting with her desire to be free as a ‘new adult female ‘ , finally consequences in her self-destruction at the terminal of the drama. This is seen when Hedda falls into Brack ‘s power, and Hedda decides that she is “ Not free. Still non free! “ [[ 27 ]] , and “ could n’t bear that ” [[ 28 ]] . Ibsen therefore criticizes the resistance to the outgrowth of the “ new adult female ” represented by the sentiments of the Victorian society that Hedda feared, showing its ability to drive Hedda, a ‘new adult female ‘ , to suicide.

However, I believe that Euripides besides utilized the character, Medea, for another intent. In the drama, Medea represents the laden adult female, seting away many feminist thoughts, and this is used by Euripides to oppugn the right for work forces to keep so much authorization over adult females [[ 29 ]] . Such feminist thoughts, within the patriarchal Greek society, would be extremely controversial. By portraying Medea as a monstrous adult female, Euripides conveys these controversial thoughts utilizing a corrupt mouthpiece, blunting the impact of such extremist thoughts. Possibly he has done this in order to cut down the effects and possible stigma originating from showing such extremist positions. In contrast, Ibsen wrote Hedda Gabler towards the terminal of the Victorian epoch, where society was easy going more broad, particularly in the country sing the function of adult females in society [[ 30 ]] [[ 31 ]] . Therefore, Ibsen is able to to the full show his thoughts in his drama without much fright of reverberations.

In decision, the portraiture and word picture of unconventional female figures have been used by Euripides and Ibsen to raise inquiries about of import issues. Though similar in intent, the writers have utilized different methods to accomplish this, with Euripides utilizing Medea ‘s victory to discourse the equality of the sexes in Grecian society, and Ibsen utilizing Hedda ‘s ruin to arouse commiseration in the reader for the predicament of the ‘new adult female ‘ in Victorian society.

Page 6 of 7



1 ) Euripides. ( 2002 ) . Medea. ( J. Michael Walton, Trans. ) . United Kingdom: Methuen Publishing. ( Original Work published 431 BC ) .

2 ) Ibsen, Henrik. ( 2002 ) . Hedda Gabler. ( Michael Meyer, Trans. ) . United Kingdom: Methuen Publishing. ( Original Work published 1890 ) .

3 ) Williamson, Margaret. “ A Woman ‘s Topographic point in Euripides ‘ Medea. ” Taken from: Euripides, Women, and Sexuality. Ed. Anton Powell. Routledge, New York 1990.

Web sites:

4 ) Alexandra Kollontai. ( 1918 ) New Woman. In The New Morality and the Working Class. Retrieved June 12th 2009, from: hypertext transfer protocol: //

5 ) Anonymous. ( Oct 2, 2005 ) . The Angel In The House. In William Makepeace Thackaray. Retrieved April 28th, 2009, from: hypertext transfer protocol: // /angel.html

6 ) Shepherd, Anne. ( April 2001 ) . Overview of the Victorian Era. In History In Focus ( The Victorian Era ) . Retrieved 19 July, 2009, from: hypertext transfer protocol: //

7 ) Wilson, Andrew. ( December 2007 ) . Medea Intro. In Euripides ‘ Medea. Retrieved 22 July, 2009, from: hypertext transfer protocol: //

8 ) Wojtczak, Helena. ( April 2008 ) .Women ‘s Rights to Property and the Vote. In The Victorian Web ( Gender Matters ) . Retrieved 19 July, 2009, from: hypertext transfer protocol: //

Significance of issues and entrywaies in Hedda Gabler and Miss Julie

In both Scandinavian plays Miss Julie by August Strindberg and Hedda Gabler by Henrik Ibsen, the entrywaies and issues of characters are extremely important, though for different grounds. In this essay, “ entrywaies ” will be defined as the minutes when a character comes onstage. “ Exits ” , likewise, will be the minutes when a character leaves wing.

First, the issue of Christine, is symbolic of the going of virtuousness and morality. Christine is a stock character ; Strindberg describes her as “ a female slave, utterly conventional ”[ 32 ], “ stuffed full of faith and morality ”[ 33 ]. Strindberg besides opines that theater was “ a Bible in images for the benefit of the nonreader ; with the playwright as a ballad sermonizer ”[ 34 ]. Therefore, Christine ‘s function is the voice of morality, which “ in the absence of a priest, I [ Strindberg ] have left to a cook ”[ 35 ]. In her presence, Jean exercises self-denial: he returns to his fiancee Christine, go forthing his dance spouse, Julie ; and tells her off for upseting Christine while she sleeps, since “ slumber is something to be respected ”[ 36 ]. However, one time Christine “ aftermaths and wanders somnolently right to travel to bed ”[ 37 ], Julie flirts more openly with Jean ; she “ experience his bicep ”[ 38 ]and orders him to snog her manus. Once Christine leaves the phase, the absence of a moral, spiritual character parallels the moral impairment of the staying characters onstage, conglomerating in Jean and Julie ‘s wing sexual intercourse.

Christine ‘s entrywaies besides serve other symbolic intents. The 2nd clip Christine returns to the kitchen, she is “ dressed for church, with a prayer-book in her manus ”[ 39 ], which farther contributes to the image of a moral and spiritual character. The audience immediately identifies Christine as possessing these qualities, and allows them to appreciate the ocular metaphor of Julie “ [ falling ] into her weaponries, as though seeking shelter ”[ 40 ]. This represents Julie trying to turn to religion both as an flight from her jobs, every bit good as to deliver herself and her repute. When Christine repeats the Lord ‘s instructions to her, and how “ He ‘ll take all our wickednesss upon Him ”[ 41 ], Julie cries, “ Oh, if merely I had your religion! ”[ 42 ]Julie seeks shelter in Christianity, and wants to cleanse herself of the wickednesss she has committed. Strindberg uses the ocular metaphor of Christine ‘s entryway here to accomplish this visually.

As the drama reaches its flood tide, Jean manages to carry Julie to conceal in his room before the provincials come in and descry them. They both exit into Jean ‘s sleeping room, while onstage, the provincials “ watercourse in, [ aˆ¦ ] vocalizing: ‘One immature miss in a large dark wood! ‘ ”[ 43 ]The entryway of the provincials serves double intents. First, it allows Jean and Julie to mate wing, avoiding expressed reenactment onstage. Second, their entryway represents the province of pandemonium come ining the drama. As the provincials cavort about, they cut down Christine ‘s tidy kitchen to a dishevelled muss. For the audience, the phase is now visually more helter-skelter, compared to the gap of the drama, with Christine at the caput of a neat and ordered kitchen. Symbolically, it marks the entryway of pandemonium into the characters ‘ lives.

Finally, the concluding issue of the drama is a ocular metaphor of Strindberg ‘s thoughts of the “ half-woman ” . In Strindberg ‘s clip during the late 1800s, the recent Industrial Revolution at the terminal of the nineteenth century polarized the gender functions in society. The adult female was confined to hearth and place, while the work forces ventured Forth into the kingdom of concern, political relations and sociableness[ 44 ]. Julie, hence, in experimenting with others outside her societal category, and ruling her fiance by “ seting him through his gaits ”[ 45 ], likely represents the “ modern ” women’s rightists, who began emerging by the early 1900s. Strindberg suggests that these women’s rightists would non last, as they are “ a relic of the old warrior aristocracy ”[ 46 ], who “ can non populate without honor ”[ 47 ]. Julie exits the scene by “ [ walking ] steadfastly out through the door ”[ 48 ], because by the terminal of the drama she believes she has redeemed herself, now that she sees herself among the last, and would be able to have grace from God. Julie ‘s issue foreshadows her decease and the terminal of this “ modern adult female ” ; by contrast, Jean remains onstage, the subsister of the dark ‘s events.

Unlike in Miss Julie, entrances in Hedda Gabler are meant to lend to the word picture of the drama ‘s characters by act uponing the audience ‘s first feelings about their personality. The deepness of the character ‘s visual aspect allows the audience to firmly associate Hedda to the blue upper category by supplying a ocular component to her word picture. For illustration, Ibsen ‘s description of Hedda when she foremost enters depict her as “ distinguished ” , with an “ blue face and nature ” and a “ picket and opalescent ” skin color[ 49 ]. These properties contribute to Hedda ‘s ocular image, and from the beginning, the audience relates this blue visual aspect with her blue nature. Conversely, Strindberg has no descriptions of Julie on her visual aspects onstage. Strindberg has few detailed descriptions about his characters because of his contempt of utilizing specific features to separate characters. He mentions that he made his supporters “ slightly missing in ‘character ‘ ”[ 50 ], because attaching traits to characters makes them fixed, inactive, “ in other words, stopped turning ”[ 51 ]. This was contrary to his naturalist positions, because Strindberg knew “ how amply complex a human psyche is ”[ 52 ], and therefore abstained from imputing properties to his characters.

Judge Brack ‘s entrywaies in the Tesman family besides serve to uncover his character. On formal occasions, he enters through the front door, ever with his chapeau in his custodies: on his first visit when the Tesmans arrived place, and when he brings intelligence of Eliert Loevborg. This indicates his well-bred and blue nature, being a adult male who knows the regulations of societal intercourse and how to interrupt them[ 53 ]. On his early call to the Tesmans in Act I, he asks, “ May 1 presume to name so early? ”[ 54 ], to which there is merely one reply, “ One may assume ”[ 55 ]. By contrast, Hedda greets Juliana Tesman earlier on in the Act with “ What an early hr to name ” , stressing Miss Tesman ‘s fake pas.

However, when run intoing Hedda entirely in Act II, Brack uses the Gallic Windowss alternatively of the front door. The Gallic Windowss are considered as the back door to the house, and Brack ‘s motion through this unconventional room access reveals his desire to come in the matrimony relationship of George and Hedda discreetly and illicitly. When he leaves in Act III, he exits through the Gallic Windowss every bit good, and Tells Hedda that “ people do n’t hit tame pricks ”[ 56 ], reminding her that she needs him to be the 3rd corner in her trigon. Brack ‘s entrywaies and issues high spots his features and motivations.

Finally, Hedda ‘s issues into the rear room represent her efforts to derive control over her life. The upstage rear room is her private sanctuary, her personal infinite. At the terminal of Act I, she exits into the rear room to play with her male parent ‘s handguns[ 57 ]– the lone heirlooms she has – and, because of their possible for slaying and decease, typify her desire for power and control. In Act II, she ushers Brack and Tesman into the rear room while she manipulates Loevborg and Thea in the drawing room[ 58 ]. By puting Brack in the rear room, which overlooks the drawing room, she is able to utilize the menace of Brack ‘s watching eyes to forestall an emotional effusion in both Thea and Loevborg, bust uping Loevborg ‘s religion in Thea[ 59 ], to derive “ the power to determine a adult male ‘s fate ”[ 60 ]. Finally, she “ drags Mrs Elvsted about forcibly ”[ 61 ]towards the rear room, stating that she will “ fire your hair off after all ”[ 62 ]. Hedda, covetous of Thea ‘s abundant hair and love for Loevborg, prefers to exert control over Thea every bit good, therefore her usage of physical force to drive Thea through the rear room, her personal district.

Because of Hedda ‘s issues through this infinite, the audience would see a sense of predicting when Hedda enters it to play the “ manic dance tune ”[ 63 ]on the piano near the terminal of Act IV. Their intuitions would be confirmed when Hedda shoots herself within the chamber[ 64 ]. She retreats to her sanctuary because the other characters have taken over the remainder of the phase: Tesman and Thea occupy her authorship desk, patching together Loevborg ‘s notes ; her chair by the range is dominated by Brack, who continuously unleashes veiled menaces about the clip they will pass entirely together. Visually, her personal infinite, every bit good as her whole life, is out of her control ; therefore, her issue into her sanctuary foreshadows her self-destruction.

In decision, Strindberg ‘s utilizations character entrywaies and issues to demo the entry or going of certain abstract thoughts which the characters are associated with. Ibsen, nevertheless, uses these motions on- and offstage to lend to the word picture of the characters in his drama. Furthermore, it is non merely the characters traveling in and out of the scene which is of import, but besides the location they enter from or issue to, as these might hold implicit in significances which contribute to the text.

( Word Count: 1,498 words )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *