This essay aims to discourse the effectivity of political theater in doing societal alteration, looking specifically at the pattern of the modern-day political dramatist Augusto Boal including the influence of societal theoretician Karl Marx on Boal ‘s work and how Marxism affected Boal ‘s manner of theater. This essay will get down by looking at the beginnings of theater and how it has been used since so as a medium of advancing political idea. However, in order to understand political theater we must foremost be able to understand what is mean by political relations, the Oxford Reference Dictionary ( 1991:647 ) describes something ‘political ‘ as “ impacting the State or its Government ; of public personal businesss. ” From this definition we are able to infer that political theater is theatre that is produced in order to impact or act upon the community and those in power with respect to public personal businesss. This type of theater has been used and enjoyed since the really beginning of theatre as we know it today, which began in Ancient Greece in the jubilation of the festival of Dionysos, the God of rapture. The festival included supplication and emanation every bit good as vocalizing and dance, there may besides hold been groups of performing artists who would reply each other through the medium of vocal or dance. It is believed that it was Thespis who stood out and performed foremost without the chorus, and therefore making what we understand to be a supporter. ( GREEK THEATRE 1 ) Competitions so began to take topographic point during the festivals in which dramatists would come in their dramas to be performed, either a calamity, or a comedy and satyr drama. The Grecian dramatists would show the audience with thoughts to believe about and reflect over ; during the dramas a Parabasis, or ‘stepping aside ‘ would take topographic point, this was an chance for the dramatist to notice upon the province of metropolis personal businesss or anything else that he so wished. Aristophanes thought that, “ the playwright should non merely offer pleasance but should, besides that, be a instructor of morality and a political adviser. “ ( in Boal 2008: thirteen ) In his dramas, Aristophanes would satirize the most of import people of the twenty-four hours, in between the scenes the chorus would execute short, satirical pieces of vocal and dance ever assailing good known persons by name, for illustration he ridiculed the rabble-rouser Kleon in his drama ‘Babylonians ‘ . However, a plays success depended on the support from the affluent nobility ay the clip, the choragus therefore the dramas produced may be seen to reflect the position of the choregus instead than that of the dramatist, because without them a drama would non hold the support to be performed. Grecian society was much controlled by the economic minority, the Bourgeoisie, but nil was done to alter this. This province of personal businesss in Ancient Greece is really similar to the societal state of affairs that Karl Marx was contending against when he introduced his communist pronunciamento ; the option to capitalist economy. Marx believed that human existences have been conditioned throughout history to act a certain manner by economic establishments and that in order for an equal society without a societal hierarchy so the labor must prehend power from the middle class through a societal revolution and topographic point everything in corporate ownership.
In his book “ Theatre of the Oppressed ” Augusto Boal writes how Marx believed that art is a cardinal manner of offering cognition, but this cognition is conveyed from the position of the creative person, societal milieus or whoever provides sponsorship or payment. Chiefly, it is the portion of society that maintains economic power that holds command over any agencies of communicating. Bordwell and Thompson ( in Woodson, no day of the month ) back this up:
Each art signifier is controlled, non by the creative persons, but by larger societal establishments. In a capitalist society, an creative person may believe he or she is utilizing the art signifier for personal look, but he or she is really bring forthing ware of a sort acceptable to the society.
It is merely from the reaching of Karl Marx and his theories on socialism that dramatists and practicians have begun to utilize theater as a agency for alteration. Bertolt Brecht was greatly influenced by the Marxist theory because he excessively wanted to make alteration, “ the major end of the historical vanguard was to dispute the establishment of bourgeois art ” ( Kistenberg 1995:29 ) ; Pescator described Brecht ‘s work as a Marxist-based analysis of societal dealingss. Brecht agreed with Marx that it was the capitalists that created the businessperson society, and that play can be used as a medium of didacticism. It was from this belief that Brecht adopted Piscators signifier of daring theater known as heroic poem theater. Epic theater has many analogues with Cartesian tradition in which people are encouraged into rational idea ; it underlines the socio-political content of play instead than seeking to pull strings the emotions of the audience. Brecht stated that there must be a “ transmutation of psychological ‘conflict ‘ into historic status ” ( in Basuki no day of the month ) in theater in order to let go of the ‘self ‘ and to make rational idea. This Cartesian belief is needed so that neither the audience nor the histrion tries to sympathize with the action and characters on phase and are able to see the action with a critical head. In order to make this Brecht proposed that theater needed to give to the audience a procedure of disaffection because “ disaffection is necessary to all apprehension ” ( Brecht in Basuki no day of the month ) so that they are able to organize an sentiment unfettered by empathy. The term Brecht used to depict this distancing of the audience is Verfremdungseffekt, which when translated, means disaffection. In a description about heroic poem theater Brecht gives an account about the difference between a witness watching dramatic theater and one observation heroic poem theater:
The dramatic theater ‘s witness says: Yes, I have felt like that too-Just like me-It ‘s merely natural-It ‘ll ne’er change-The agony of this adult male appals me, because they are inescapable-That ‘s great art ; it all seems the most obvious thing in the world-I weep when they weep, I laugh when they laugh.
The heroic poem theater ‘s witness says: I ‘d ne’er hold thought it-that ‘s non the way-That ‘s extraordinary, barely believable-It ‘s got to stop-The agonies of this adult male appal me, because they are unnecessary-That ‘s great art: nil obvious in it-I laugh when they weep, I weep when they laugh ( Brecht in Basuki no day of the month )
This quotation mark from Brecht shows us how he intended epic theater to work and its popularity among dramatists and managers is a great illustration of how successful heroic poem theater is as a signifier of didacticism. However, in Brecht ‘s plays the separation between the phase and the audience is still present. The witness is persuaded to believe the ideas and sentiments that presented to them through the action on phase because it is the dramatists who condemns the characters or the events that have taken topographic point ; the audience ‘s ideas are simply pointed in the right way by the playwright ( OPPRESSED xx ) Augusto Boal, though extremely influenced by the likes of Marx and Brecht took the format of heroic poem theater to a new degree. He found ways of uniting Marxist theory with new ways of authorship and analysis. He believed that in order to emancipate the audience from the restraints of phase and witness, they themselves must be portion of what is go oning on phase “ To transform is to be transformed. “ ( Boal 2008: twenty-one ) and therefore going spect-actors. From this belief Boal created ‘ the Theatre of the Oppressed ‘ in which the audience are asked to mediate, and suggest the following class of action for the histrions to execute or really execute themselves, whilst the histrions assist and persuade the audience to take the function of a spect-actor. For illustration, in forum theater, the histrions perform a short drama with which ends with unsolved subjugation and so it is performed once more but this clip the spect-actor is able to go involved and suggest ways to repair the subjugation. Boal saw the witness ‘s invasion of the phase as a symbolic minute in their transmutation, “ This invasion is a symbolic trespass. It symbolises all the Acts of the Apostless of trespass we have to perpetrate in order to liberate ourselves from what oppresses us. ” ( Boal 2008: twenty-one ) By making this the spect-actor is made cognizant of what he needs to make in order to alter the state of affairs in his existent societal scene, and by interrupting down the wall between witness and histrion, Boal besides breaks the wall between the oppressor and the oppressed. ( BOAL ESSAY )
English Theatre company Cardboard citizens is one of the taking manufacturers of Forum Theatre in the UK, this company is made up of stateless people or those at hazard of going homeless. Cardboard Citizens tour the UK, executing for other Homeless people, and as it states on their web site, taking to “ problem-solve together ” . ( CARDBOARD WEBSITE ) Although this is an first-class manner of seeking to make societal alteration, it may be the instance that the company perform to an audience who are already cognizant of the state of affairs being presented to them, and are hence ‘preaching to the converted ‘ . In ‘The Transparent Closet: Gay Theatre for Straight Audiences ‘ , Richard Hall ( in Kistenberg 1995:76 ) suggests:
Theatre is inefficient as an instrument for societal alteration. It either speaks to those already in support of its positions, or to those who are so unafraid in their power that they do n’t mind hearing themselves abused, every bit long as the maltreatment is entertaining.
Although theater is an first-class signifier of communicating, it is unable to entree the parts of society in which people do non watch theater that is seen to be anything other than mainstream amusement i.e. Musicals etc. This so stops the theater from being its most effectual. Equally good as this, political theater may go an mercantile establishment for people to corroborate their sentiments, for illustration, David Hare ‘s drama ‘Stuff Happens ‘ was written as a reaction to the Iraq War, person who has negative beliefs about this event may watch the drama merely so their sentiments are confirmed. This once more may halt the theater from being at its most effectual. Although Cardboard Citizens ‘ usage of forum theater has helped many stateless people ‘s state of affairss and is working to derive apprehension of the battles stateless people encounter, Elizabeth Burns states that the audience “ … position themselves as portion of a public presentation instead than public presentation as portion of their lives ” ( in Kistenberg 1995:32 ) She believes that the audience are simply props for the histrions and that because they are in a province of being neither to the full portion of the public presentation nor full offprint so it is n’t much different from their usual function as witness. If this is the instance so the witnesss of Cardboard Citizens ‘ public presentations, even if they were able to show their theater to a much wider and varied sort of audience, would non be much changed by what they have seen.
Boal ‘s following measure in making societal alteration could be seen to hold a great impact on society, he generated a signifier of theater named ‘Legislative Theatre ‘ in which theater is used to make an active and practical alteration in society.
Boal ran for election and was voted in to be one of 42 vereadoresA of Rio, ( BOAL ESSAY ) he used his new political place to make ‘Legislative Theatre ‘ . In this type of theatre Boal attempted “ To utilize theater within a political system to make a truer from of democracy ” ( Boal 2008: I ) This type of theatre utilizations all the techniques of the theater of the oppressed in order to make new Torahs, Boal would take his theater to the streets of Rio and asked the people what they thought of certain issues so proposed his findings to the council chamber. In this manner he was able to set frontward Torahs to be passed that had a important impact on the people of Rio, for illustration, one jurisprudence that was passed was one which protected the informants of offenses. ( LEGISLATIVE THEATRE 104 ) .
Theatre is non merely about entertaining the multitudes ; it provides a agency in which to acquire a message across. Although all of theaters could be said to be political in a broader sense, it is political theater that has been established as planing a theater that is left wing and that expresses the demand for extremist alteration. Political theater has thrived under oppressive authoritiess as a agency of pass oning political sentiments ; nevertheless this has non ever been the instance. In malice of how apparently political Greek theater appears the censoring of the dramas provides grounds towards the fact that it was non and it did small to dispute and alter the societal hierarchy of the clip because it was controlled by the people in power. Grecian theater started by being synergistic and an unfastened signifier of communicating ; nevertheless the right to talk was taken off when the citizens were split into chorus and audience. It is apparently dry so that it was person talking out of bend that foremost created this signifier of theater but by being made to be the audience the remainder were stifled.
Looking back at how political theater has developed over the old ages it is clear of the relevancy of each single practician at the several times in which they were composing, for illustration, in the old ages of utmost censoring by the Bourgeoisie when Brecht was composing he was one of the first practicians to utilize theater to do people aware of their state of affairs hence edifying them because it was the first clip they had been shown the truth. However now, in the twenty-first Century when people are able to entree, via the agencies of the cyberspace for illustration, all types of imformation without censoring they are given the chance through patterns such as Boals to actively alter society. Boal ‘s Legislative Theatre encapsulates the purpose of political theater. As Brecht used Epic theater in order to make societal alteration, Boal took his format and physically created alteration through the arrangement of new Torahs. This is finally the purpose of political theater, to let go of the oppressed from the oppressor.
Decision.
Zortman ( 2 ) says that “ The daring creative persons were denounced as ‘breeders ‘ of the proletarian universe revolution ”
Quotes 356 / 1403words.
