There is no denying the fact that the ability to larn at least one foreign linguistic communication is a critical necessity in today ‘s globalized universe. Nunan writes: ” Language is arguably the specifying feature of the human species and cognition of linguistic communication in general, every bit good as the ability to utilize one ‘s first and, at least one other linguistic communication, should be one of the specifying features of the educated person. ”

This is corroborated by Ellis who strictly argues about the of all time increasing planetary integrating. He claims the universe has become smaller, that it has in fact morphed into the so – called “ planetary small town ” . He goes on to claim we are populating in an epoch of huge technological invention where communicating among people has expanded manner beyond their local address.

( Ellis, 1997, p.3 )

“ Nowadays a foreign / 2nd linguistic communication forms a lasting portion of all types of course of study, from primary schools to universities. The demands of the modern-day society together with the place of English as an international linguistic communication may show a ground for larning this linguistic communication in peculiar. ”

( McKay, p.5 )

Due to the of all time increasing demand for foreign linguistic communications such as English, more effectual acquisition methods are invariably being created in order to better pupils ‘ English accomplishments. The English linguistic communication learning profession has, hence, changed significantly over the last decennaries in visible radiation of advanced communicative linguistic communication learning attacks. Training scholars to be able to utilize English for communicative intents has become the end. In order to develop communicative competency, scholars should get the hang four major accomplishments: hearing, speech production, reading and composing. However, among the given four accomplishments, it is now by and large recognized that listening plays a cardinal function in easing linguistic communication acquisition. As Rost ( 1994, p.141-142 ) points out, listening is of import in the linguistic communication schoolroom because of supplying input for the scholar. Unless the pupil has an apprehension of linguistic communication input at the needed degree, any larning merely can non happen. Listening, hence, is critically indispensable non merely as a receptive accomplishment but besides for the developments of spoken linguistic communication proficiency in general.

In many colleges and universities of Vietnam, hearing has played a really of import portion in larning a foreign linguistic communication and is recognized as the rule aim of many linguistic communication classs. However, many troubles in learning listening accomplishments in Vietnam in general and at Dalat Army Academy in peculiar still exist. Vietnamese pupils can by and large compose and read English rather good, but they have serious jobs with respects to their hearing capablenesss. There are many grounds for this. After holding taught English at foresaid academy for several old ages, I believe to hold discovered several cardinal issues that prevent an betterment of their hearing ability. The bulk of non- majored military pupils have ne’er truly been taught how to listen to English. They have practiced hearing, they have been tested, but they have ne’er been taught or given counsel about how to listen to English. Students, therefore, have troubles understanding the content when listening. They normally fail to grok and so give up when they can non do out what is traveling on. When they are asked to rank the four macro linguistic communication accomplishments: hearing, speech production, reading and composing in order of trouble, listening accomplishments is one which is normally put at the top of the list.

Obviously, scholars should be adequately supported through assorted pre-listening activities such as previewing inquiries, pre-listening to relevant subjects, and pre-discussion of relevant subjects before listening to the existent text. Appropriate readying before hearing is critical for pupils ‘ acquisition in a foreign environment. It is vitally of import in order to give them a opportunity to grok the content of the mark linguistic communication. In order to work out this job, I think that supplying listening support such as inquiry prevue and vocabulary debut may be necessary to assist pupils to be more confident vis a vis hearing. Therefore I have a strong inducement to look into the effects of two listening schemes – inquiry prevue and vocabulary direction on heightening listening accomplishments for non – majored military pupils at ArmyAcademy Dalat metropolis.

To transport out my thesis research, the first measure hence is to inquire myself the following research inquiries:

Do two different listening methods influence non-major pupils ‘ listening capablenesss in different ways? If the reply is yes, so which method leads to a more effectual comprehension in general?

Does each single sort of listening method lead to the same consequence on non-majored pupils of different English hearing proficiency? If the reply is no, so which method will be effectual for high degree or low degree pupils?

What are non-majored military pupils ‘ perceptual experiences of the two methods?

Literature reappraisal

“ Listening comprehension precedes production in all instances of linguistic communication acquisition, and there can be no production unless lingual input was provided and became comprehendible consumption for a hearer. ”

( Byrnes, 1984, p.318-319 )

Contained within the complex construction of linguistic communication acquisition, hearing is defined and distinguished as one of the four key linguistic communication skills that make up one’s mind overall linguistic communication competency. Each linguistic communication accomplishment fuses one of two linguistic communication modes to one of two treating sorts. The coalescency of one linguistic communication mode ( audiotory or ocular ) with one processing sort ( decrypting or encoding ) defines each of the four linguistic communication accomplishments.

Listening is an ability marked by the procedure of decyphering audile input. The definition of listening comprehension goes a measure further and really incorporates the procedure of decrypting audile stimulations by attesting itself into a mental representation that fuels and interprets the purpose of a talker. In this essay, I chiefly gathered and quoted theoretical literature and thoughts or citation of other writers and beginnings which are in the widest sense related to my thesis. First, I will concentrate on possible factors that might impact listening comprehension. Following, I will analyse literature related to two types of listening methods because they are indispensable experimental variables in this survey. I want to cognize more about the consequence of two single methods of listening schemes on listening comprehension. Following I will dig into old surveies which compared the comparative effectivity of two schemes ; the ground hereby is to familiarise myself with what the old surveies have already revealed and besides to chart countries necessitating farther survey. Furthermore, I will compose about the pros and cons of Listening Strategy Instruction. Finally, I summarize the content of literature and present some thoughts to associate to the following methodological analysis.

1. Definition of listening

There are many different positions sing the definition of hearing.

Harmonizing to Field ( 1998, p.38 ) , listening is “ an unseeable mental procedure, doing it hard to depict. Hearers must know apart between sounds, understand vocabulary and grammatical constructions, interpret emphasis and purpose, retain and construe this within the intermediate every bit good as the lager socio-cultural context of the vocalization. ”

Mary Underwood ( 1989, p.1 ) maintains that “ hearing is the activity of paying attending to and seeking to acquire intending from something we hear so that the hearer must acknowledge and construe the other factors which are used to convey the messages ” .

Listening is theoretically considered as a procedure in which persons concentrate on selected country of aural input, concept significance from transitions, and associate what they hear to bing cognition ( O’Malley, Chamot and Kupper ( 1989 ) ) .

Anderson and Lynch ( 1988 ) define hearing as “ the agencies to immediate unwritten production, the imitation of spoken signifiers ” . Hearers hear the input every bit good as actively process the message with comprehension in head. The aim of listening comprehension is to enable the scholars to speak and compose about what they have heard after listening.

Buck ( 2001, p.31 ) points out that listening is an active procedure of building intending via the use of cognition to the incoming sound in which both lingual and non-linguistic cognition is involved. He indicates that “ comprehension is affected by a broad scope of variables, and that potentially any feature of the talker, the state of affairs or the hearer can impact the comprehension of the message ” .

In short, it can be said that hearing is a linguistic communication accomplishment affecting a broad scope of “ sub-skills ” . It is more than merely hearing ; it is “ decrypting ” sounds and understanding the significance behind those sounds. ( Forseth, 1996 )

Factors impacting listening comprehension

In order to augment scholars ‘ listening comprehension, it is imperative that we understand all the factors which may impact listening comprehension. Harmonizing to Boyle ( 1984 ) , factors impacting listening comprehension can approximately be divided into three groups: hearer factors, talker factors, and factors in the stuff and medium. Among these, hearer factors can be farther subdivided into two subdivisions, one being general factors, such as experience / pattern in listening to the mark linguistic communication, general intelligence, and general background cognition ; the other being more specific factors like age / sex and educational background, rational factors, like cognition of the mark in its assorted facets: phonemics, lexis, sentence structure, coherence, cognition of the specific subject or capable, memory ( short term and long term ) , and psychological factors, like motive and sense of intent while listening, every bit good as the hearer ‘s powers of attending and concentration.

Speaker factors include four of import parts. The first is the linguistic communication ability of the talker. This means a talker ‘s English proficiency degree is one factor impacting the hearer ‘s listening comprehension. Whether the middleman is a native or non-native talker, a novice or advanced scholar can all impact listening comprehension. The 2nd is the talker ‘s address form including pronunciation, speech pattern, fluctuation, voice, etc. This means wrong pronunciation, unusual speech pattern, and fluctuation of the same word, and different voice ( e.g. adult male vs adult female ‘s voice ) can impact listening comprehension. The 3rd is velocity of bringing. This means that the velocity of speaking, either excessively slow or excessively fast, will impair listening comprehension. The 4th is the societal standing and personality of the talker. This implies that the words or looks the talker utilizations are related to his societal background and personality.

Extra factors in the stuff and medium include four indispensable elements. The first is the linguistic communication used to convey the message. The 2nd is trouble of content and constructs. The 3rd is acoustic environment: noise and intervention. The 4th is the sum of external support provided by gesture, ocular, etc. ( See Table 2 ) .

Table 2: Factors in the literature, as cited in Boyle ( 1984 )

Listener factors

General

1. Experience/ pattern in listening to the mark: usage of the media ( film, Television, wireless, etc. )

2. General intelligence

3. General background cognition of the universe

More specific

4. Physical and educational

4.1 age/sex

4.2 place background, size of household

4.3 educational background

4.4 physical wellness and watchfulness

5. Intellectual

5.1 cognition of the mark linguistic communication in its assorted facets: phonemics, lexis, syntaxt, and coherence

5.2 power of analysis and choice: ability to separate between chief and back uping points

5.3 cognition of the specific subject or capable

5.4 memory

6. Psychological

6.1 motive and sense of intent while listening

6.2 attitude of the hearer to the talker

6.3 attitude of the hearer to the message: degree of involvement

6.4 hearer ‘s powers of attending and concentration

B. Speaker factors

1. linguistic communication ability of the talker: native talker – novice – degree not native talker

2. Speaker ‘s production: pronunciation, speech pattern, fluctuation, voice, etc.

3. Speed of deliver

4. Prestige and personality of the talker

C. Factors in the stuff and medium

1. The linguistic communication used to convey the message: phonological characteristics, including emphasis, modulation, weak signifiers ( particularly in conversation ) , lexis, syntax, coherence, etc.

2. Trouble of content and constructs, particularly if the stuff is abstract, abstruse, extremely specialised or proficient, escoeric, drawn-out, ill organized.

3. Acoustic environment: noise and intervention.

4. Sum of support provided by gestures, visuals, etc.

Above found information indicates that factors impacting listening comprehension are many in figure and complicated. Due to clip restriction, this survey can non take into consideration all the possible factors impacting listening comprehension. We are therefore forced to contract down the scope of possible factors and research if two types of listening schemes including inquiry prevue and vocabulary direction will extenuate the negative influence from the fast velocity of bringing and noise and intervention every bit good as addition the hearer ‘s cognition of the mark linguistic communication in lexis and the hearer ‘s powers of attending and concentration. The undermentioned two subdivisions are literature reappraisals related to these two sorts of listening schemes.

3. Two schemes: Question prevue and vocabulary direction

3.1 Question prevue

Harmonizing to several research workers, inquiry prevue has positive effects on listening comprehension because it provides utile hints to steer scholars in the right way during the procedure of listening. ( Buck,1991 ; Cohen,1984 ; Shohamy & A ; Inbar, 1991 ) But, other research workers ( Ur, 1984 ; Weir, 1993 ) disagree. They consider that inquiry prevue may alter the nature of the hearing procedure itself because the previewing likely disturbs hearers ‘ attending sing existent input. Buck ( 1991 ) conducted an experiment to look into the effects of inquiry prevue on listening comprehension. The research worker compared the questionaire consequences of topics who previewed inquiries with that of topics who did n’t and establish out that the former reported they thought previewing inquiries non merely helped them understand better but besides made the trial itself less hard. Chen ( 2004 ) besides conducted an experiment to look into the consequence of inquiry prevue on listening public presentation of junior high school pupils. His findings indicate the junior high EFL pupils benefited significantly from inquiry prevue. In add-on, questionare responses confirmed the positive effects of inquiry prevue, which supported the consequence of Buck ‘s survey. Furthermore, Chen found that hearers of high and intermediate proficiency degrees gained much more aid from the inquiry prevue than did those of low proficiency degree. The consequence besides suggests that inquiry prevue promotes information anticipation and top-down information processing of trial takers. I ask myself if the consequence of non-majored pupils in this survey will be the same in Chen ‘s survey. Teng ( 1999 ) besides conducted a survey to analyze the effects of inquiry type and inquiry prevue on EFL Listening Assessment. The survey investigated the effects of inquiry types ( multiple – pick, wh-questions, and near points ) and inquiry prevue on appraisal of English-as-a-Foreign-language ( EFL ) listening comprehension. The trial topics were 90 freshers at a university, indiscriminately assigned to two groups. One was provided with a inquiry prevue before listening to a transition, while the other was non. All of the topics answered the three different inquiry types after listening to the transition. Consequences indicated that the topics had better listening public presentation while replying multiple- pick inquiries than while replying other inquiry sorts. Furthermore, inquiry prevue appears to hold facilitated listening public presentation. Furthermore, extra hearing comprehension proving techniques are suggested, including the usage of inquiry types with gestural response such as multiple-choice inquiries, holding pupils read inquiries before the trial begins, and planing trial inquiries harmonizing to pupils ‘ hearing proficiency. The findings hereby besides supported the positive consequence of inquiry prevue. It besides inspired the research worker in this survey to follow multiple pick inquiries of listening comprehension trials. Constructing on these consequences, I would wish to find if previewing inquiries is the most helpful hearing method for non-majored pupils at Dalat Army Academy.

3.2 Vocabulary Direction on Listening Comprehension

Rixon ( 1990 ) states that “ one of the most obvious beginnings of listening trouble for a scholar of English is the manner in which it is pronounced ” ( p.39 ) and goes on to state that listening troubles originate from pronunciation, exemplified by the weak relationship between English sounds and the manner they are spelled in written linguistic communication. Therefore, it is of import to reenforce the relationship between sounds and spelling. It inspired the research worker of the present survey to embrace spellings and pronunciation instruction in the vocabulary direction. In add-on, Tsai ( 2005 ) conducted a survey to look into the relationship between receptive English vocabulary sizes and listening comprehension competency of college EFL pupils. The consequence indicated that there were so significantly positive correlativities between the topics ‘ public presentations on the hearing and reading vocabulary degrees trials ; between the listening vocabulary degrees trial and listening comprehension trial ; between the reading vocabulary degrees trial and listening comprehension trial.

This provides more grounds that the more vocabulary the scholar has acquired prior to listening, the better listening comprehension the scholar achieves. It confirms that vocabulary direction is good for scholars. Another survey investigated the consequence of lexical collocation direction on Chinese college EFL scholars ‘ listening comprehension ( Hsu, 2005 ) . There were three groups in the survey. Each group received three different types of direction which are single-item vocabulary, lexical collocation direction, and no direction in each category. The consequences indicate that participants got the highest average mark in the comprehension trial after having lexical collocation direction. Furthermore, the informations collected from the questionaires revealed that these participants selected the lexical collocation direction as the most favorite direction type, and no direction as the least pick. It provided suggestions for the research worker of the present survey to use lexical collocation to learn vocabulary. Furthermore, Chiang ( 2000 ) conducted an experiment to analyze the consequence of assorted attacks to vocabulary presentation on the listening comprehension of university pupils in Taiwan. The consequences indicated that giving vocabulary hints in progress could assist the hearers to hold a better apprehension of the texts. Besides, context hints did hold a more good consequence on listening than did stray 1s. However, there was no difference in footings of the consequence of ocular and sound hints for vocabulary on listening comprehension. In other words, supplying pronunciation of words yielded no better consequence in comparing to merely supplying the ocular signifier of words. The consequence once more supported the position that vocabulary direction is good for listening comprehension. But the decision that ocular and sound hints for vocabulary had no different consequence on listening comprehension was contradictory to Rixon ‘s ( 1990 ) .

In order to find the impact of vocabulary direction on listening comprehension, I will carry on an experimental survey on non-majored pupils to happen out if vocabulary direction is a better hearing scheme than inquiry prevue.

4. Surveies on Comparison among the Relative Effectiveness of Different Types of listening schemes

Elkhafaifi ( 2005 ) conducted an experiment to compare the comparative effectivity of different pre-listening activities and examined whether their effectivity varied as a map of multiple exposures to the listening transition. Subjects were asked to complete a pre-listening activity ( vocabulary prevue or inquiry prevue ) or a distracting activity. The distracting activity asked pupils to compose out the figure from one to fifty while listening. The consequence showed that extra exposure to the hearing transition significantly improved listening comprehension public presentation, despite pre-listening intervention. Furthermore, topics who completed the inquiry prevue activity got significantly higher tonss than those who completed the distracting activity. In add-on, Chu ( 2004 ) conducted a survey to look into the effects of vocabulary and inquiry type direction ( similar to oppugn prevue ) on listening comprehension of EFL simple school pupils. The consequence indicated that the usage of vocabulary was most good to pupils in listening comprehension. The usage of inquiry type was good to some grade but non every bit much as with vocabulary. Furthermore, pupils had positive response toward pre-listening vocabulary instruction and previewing of inquiries. But the survey did n’t analyze if different types of pre-listening activities have different effects for different listening proficiency pupils. It left some infinite for farther survey. Chang and Read ( 2006 ) besides conducted an experiment to compare the effects of four types of listening support ( previewing the trial inquiries, repeat of the input. However, the scholar ‘s degree of listening proficiency had a important interaction consequence, particularly for inquiry prevue. Vocabulary direction was the least utile signifier of support, for any proficiency degree. The consequence was contradictory to Chu ‘s survey.

In the context of Vietnam, Le Thi Xuan Anh ( 2001 ) revealed that “ Listening Schemes ” were unconsciously used by Vietnamese pupils at third degree. She realized the relationship between the scholars ‘ listening abilities and their scheme pick. Pham Thanh Vinh ( 2002 ) investigated the troubles in listening faced by freshman pupils of English at Da Nang College of Education. Phung Thi Hoai Thu ( 2008 ) examined listening troubles perceived by instructors and pupils in utilizing the new English text edition for class 10 at Que Vo II upper-secondary school in Bac Ninh. It can be seen that most research workers mentioned focused on analyzing either the general rules for learning listening accomplishments or the jobs faced by scholars in larning hearing and suggested solutions to better their hearing accomplishment. Besides, their research topics were chiefly pupils at the third degree, non non-majored military pupils.

After taking a close expression at old surveies, I obtained sufficient background information in this field of survey. The reply to the comparative effectivity of different types of listening schemes is non systematic and consistent harmonizing to different research workers. The inquiry was to which type of listening schemes is the most good in general remains unreciprocated. Besides, the reply to the comparative effectivity of different types of listening schemes for pupils at different larning phases ( junior, senior high school, and college ) is besides diffident. Due to the restriction of clip and resources, I merely choose to carry on an experimental survey to find the comparative effectivity of two different types of listening schemes on listening support on listening public presentation of non-majored military pupils.

5. Effectss of Listening Strategy Instruction

Listening scheme direction can non merely facilitate scholars use of the linguistic communication input they receive but besides better their hearing public presentation ( Rubin, 1988 ; Thompson & A ; Rubin, 1996 ) . It is of import to integrate pre-listening and post-listening activities into listening preparation. Before listening, teachers can learn scholars to be after for the hearing undertaking ; during hearing, teachers can learn scholars how to supervise their comprehension ; and after listening, teachers can learn scholars how to measure the method they use to help comprehension, every bit good as the effects of a hearing undertaking ( Vandergrift, 1999 ) .

Thompson and Rubin ( 1996 ) assume that systematic direction in the usage of schemes would better scholars ‘ listening comprehension ability. Therefore, they conducted an experiment to analyze the consequence of scholar scheme direction on listening comprehension. The participants were pupils who were taking a needed 3rd – twelvemonth Russian linguistic communication class at George Washington University. There were two groups. One was an experimental group having scheme direction for two old ages ; the other was a control group having no scheme direction. The schemes taught to the participants in the experimental group including meta-cognitive and cognitive schemes. In the facets of meta-cognitive schemes, pupils were taught how to be after for a hearing undertaking, for illustration, make up one’s minding how many times to see a peculiar section. They were besides taught to specify the ends of the hearing undertaking, for illustration, make up one’s minding what precisely to listen for. In add-on, they were taught to supervise the results of the hearing undertaking, for illustration, measuring their comprehension. Furthermore, they were taught to measure the hearing undertaking, for illustration, measuring the effectivity of schemes used.

With respect to cognitive schemes, the participants in the experimental group were taught to foretell content based on helpful resources such as ocular hints and logic of the narrative line. They were besides taught to listen to the known, such as familiar words and phrases. Additionally, they were taught to jot down words and phrases to find what they mean and pay attending to information refering who, what, where, when, and how.

All participants listened to the hearing stuffs which contained sections from Russian telecasting and films and picture sections designed for scholars of Russian, from simulated reliable stuffs. Before the beginning of the scheme direction, all of the participants were given pretests of listening comprehension. At the terminal of scheme direction, all of them were given posttests of listening comprehension.

The consequences indicated that after scheme direction, listening public presentation of the experimental group was significantly improved compared to the control group. Thompson and Rubin ‘s hypothesis that systematic direction of listening schemes would efficaciously better hearers ‘ listening comprehension ability was confirmed.

Furthermore, Cheng ( 2002 ) investigated the effects of listening scheme direction on junior high school pupils in Taiwan. The findings revealed that listening scheme direction aided pupils a batch in their listening comprehension ; viz. , the experimental group which received listening scheme direction performed better than did the control group which did n’t have listening scheme direction. Besides, the consequences besides indicated that listening scheme direction seemingly improved get downing EFL English scholars ‘ listening comprehension ability. Therefore, it is suggested that expressed scheme direction non merely broadens the repertory of scholars ‘ schemes but besides increases the frequence of scheme usage. With respect to pupils ‘ attitudes toward listening scheme direction, most of them were positive. In add-on, pupils ‘ assurance in their ain hearing comprehension ability had besides been enlarged. Finally, it is suggested that I incorporate listening scheme direction and listening developing into classroom-based instruction in my school.

Huang ( 2003 ) besides examined the consequence of listening scheme direction for junior high school pupils in Taiwan. Two categories of 56 pupils joined this survey. One category was the control group ; the other was the experimental group. The experimental group received four sorts of listening schemes direction throughout nine months and finished the hearing exercisings, whereas the control group finished the same exercisings without any listening scheme direction. The consequences indicated that listening scheme direction assisted junior high school pupils in listening comprehension. Besides, one of the four schemes, called scanning, which means listening to keywords or inside informations, was favored most by pupils. The other scheme called lingual inferring, which means deducing intending harmonizing to the context, ranked the 2nd, followed by planing. However, the experimental group expressed that note-taking was non utile. In add-on, the research worker besides compared the consequence of the statement and the duologues on pupils ‘ listening comprehension. The consequences indicated that the experimental group benefited more from scheme preparation in the text type of statement and felt it was easier than duologues. Furthermore, scheme preparation besides helped pupils in the inquiry type of image designation ; they were able to place the right image after listening to a description.

Chien ( 200 ) besides investigated the effects of listening scheme direction for industrial vocational high school pupils. The research worker instructed 14 listening schemes to the experimental group for about one semester, whereas no direction was given to the control group. The consequences coincided with Cheng ‘s and Huang ‘s findings. The experimental group became more confident and less nervous sing listening comprehension trials. They benefited from listening scheme direction. Furthermore, their listening comprehension abilities significantly progressed. Besides, the frequence of the usage of listening scheme was seemingly increased.

In decision, listening scheme was non merely good for scholars of English in junior high school, industrial vocational high school in Taiwan but besides for scholars of Russian at a university in America. I will, hence, use the hearing scheme direction to look into the effects of two sorts – inquiry prevue and vocabulary in learning English hearing for my non-majored military pupils at low and high degrees at Army Academy Dalat metropolis.

6. Summary:

This chapter has mentioned a general position of some basic theories of two sorts of listening schemes. Besides, this chapter besides reflects my ain thoughts on them. Now we will come to the following portion to see what research methodological analysis was used to transport out this thesis.

REFERENCE BY APA STYLE

1. Anderson, A. & A ; Lynch, T. ( 1988 ) , Listening, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Buck, G. ( 2001 ) , Measuring Listening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3. Forseth, R. & A ; C. , Ta?? Tia??n Hung & A ; Nguya»…n VA?n A?a»- , ( 1996 ) , Methodology Handbook for English Teachers in Vietnam, English Language Institute America.

4. O’Malley, J.M, Chamot, A.U & A ; Kupper, L. ( 1989 ) , Listening Comprehension Strategies in Second Language Acquisition, Applied Linguistics. Vol 10, No 4.

5. Nunan, D. ( 1999 ) . Second linguistic communication instruction and acquisition. Boston: Heinle & A ; Heinle, 71.

6. Rost, M. ( 1994 ) . Introducing listening. London: Penguin, 141-142.

7. Byrnes, H. ( 1984 ) . The function of listening comprehension: A theoretical base. Foreign Language Annals, 17 ( 4 ) , 318-319.

8. Field, J. ( 1998 ) . The altering face of listening. English learning proffesional, 6:38.

9. Underbrush, M. ( 1989 ) . Teaching listening. London: Longman

B. Vietnamese

11. Le Tha»‹ Xuan Anh ( 2001 ) , An Probe of Listening Schemes Used by Vietnamese Learners of English, Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Danang University, Vietnam.

12. Phung Tha»‹ Hoai Thu ( 2008 ) , Listening Troubles Perceived by Teachers and Students in Using the New English Textbook for Grade 10 at Que Vo II Upper-Secondary School in Bac Ninh, Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Hanoi National University, Vietnam.

13. Pha??m Thanh Vinh ( 2002 ) , A Study on Some Troubles in Learning Listening of First Year Students of English at Danang College of Education, Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Danang University, Vietnam.