Explain Why In this essay I am traveling to analyze act 3 scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet to work out why it is the turning point of the drama. I will analyze the characters ; historical context ; the construction of the drama ; the chief characters and the linguistic communication used by William Shakespeare. I will besides analyze how Shakespeare built up tenseness within the audience. I have read the drama and have watched the original film directed by Zeffirelli ‘s and the modern version directed by Lurhmann. By watching both the traditional and the modern version I now have a clearer reading of the message that Shakespeare wanted to set across. It is acceptable for the drama to be modernised as it gives the message to a different audience in a manner that they can understand. Both of the versions were alone but they still carried the same message which is that love is unsighted and that although there are many different types of love, they can all take to catastrophe.
The genre of the drama is a calamity and this is clearly shown throughout the drama particularly in act 3 scene 1. The Capulet and the Montague households are both feuding. They are contending because Romeo had gate-crashed the Capulets party ; he gate crashed the party because he was trusting to see Rosaline, who he wanted to see as he thinks he loves her. Romeo has the personality of any other adolescent and is prone to acquiring into battles. The conditions was to fault for many of the battles as it was highly hot and this was doing many people agitated, so possibly if the conditions was cooler Mercutio would non hold been as argumentative and the battle would ne’er hold started. Besides, if Romeo had non gate-crashed the party Tybalt would non desire retaliation. Besides, if Romeo had stayed with Juliet, Tybalt and Mercutio would hold merely fought to allow out their choler and cipher would hold died but Romeo turned up merely at the incorrect point which meant Tybalt stabbed Mercutio. Romeo did non desire to contend ; in fact his original purpose was to halt the battle and this was because he was now related to Tybalt so he did non desire to ache one of his relations but he could non command himself after Tybalt had killed Mercutio and ended up contending with Tybalt. Before the battle Romeo says to Tybalt
“ Either 1000 or I must travel with him ”
and he is seeking to implement the fact that Mercutio has merely merely died and one of them must fall in him. Even if the battle had non taken topographic point and Romeo had non killed Tybalt, Romeo and Juliet would still non be able to populate merrily as the two households would still be contending and would non hold with their matrimony.
“ The twenty-four hours is hot, the Capels are abroad, And if we meet them we shall non get away a bash, For now, these hot yearss, is the huffy blood stirring. ”
This is really much prefiguration what is to come as the minute the two households meet a battle does get down. Benvolio highlighted twice that the conditions was really hot and this was because Elizabethans believed the heat made work forces angry and they thought that there was even more of a opportunity that there would be a battle as the conditions was hot. In the eyes of the audience this was the start of things to come as this was the start of the turning point of act 3 scene 1. This tells the audience what would go on if the two households meet but what the audience do non cognize is that the two households do run into which would hold built up tenseness in the audience.
The manner that Shakespeare puts Mercutio in the battle is demoing that act 3 scene 1 is the turning point of drama. This is because it is wholly altering Mercutio ‘s character as he is ever harmless and full of life and would ne’er acquire into a battle, and would surely non get down one. This alteration to Mercutio ‘s character affects the drama greatly because if there was no battle Mercutio would non be killed, which would of non triggered the battle between Romeo and Tybalt. This would so intend that Romeo would non be banished as he would non kill anyone. This would alter the result of the drama dramatically as Juliet would cognize where Romeo was and they could set a program together to make up one’s mind what they were traveling to make next.
Before Mercutio died he said
“ A pestilence a’both houses! ”
By stating this he was wishing the worst fortune on both of the households as they are both as much to fault as each other for the combat and all of the autumn outs over the old ages. Shakespeare had used the pestilence as this was something that was distributing throughout the clip the drama was written and if a household caught it their hereafter did non look good. This was besides dramatically boding the hereafter of the two households as even though the audience did n’t cognize it, this is what was traveling to go on ; both households were traveling to hold a great loss.
Romeo is another character that Shakespeare dramatically changes throughout act 3 scene 1 to demo that this scene is the altering point of Romeo and Juliet. One manner that Shakespeare uses Romeo to demo that this scene is the turning point is in the alteration in his attitude. At the start of the drama Romeo merely wants to be left entirely as he his believing about Rosalyne, and so there is a point at the party where he gets back to his normal ego and so falls in love with Juliet and this changes his ideas and personality dramatically as he changes his positions and ideas on the Capulet household. He realises that if he wants his matrimony to be successful he needs to do friends with Juliet ‘s household. But by the terminal of act 3 scene 1 this has changed wholly and Romeo ends up killing Tybalt who was Juliet ‘s Cousin, a Capulet. This is what wholly changed the result of the drama as Romeo is banished for killing Tybalt which ends finally in Romeo and Juliet both deceasing. This is why Romeo was the chief cause for act 3 scene 1 being the turning point of the drama.
Throughout act 3 scene 1 Shakespeare uses really dramatic and powerful linguistic communication. One illustration of this is when Tybalt says
“ thou art a scoundrel ”
this is aimed at Romeo. At the clip the drama was written this was intended as a really serious abuse and was like naming him the lowest of the low an highly bad individual. Shakespeare uses this to demo that this point in the drama is altering the remainder of the drama. By Tybalt stating this to Romeo it is doing it look as if all of the jobs are caused by Romeo and he is the cause of the hurting and agony. This shows us that Romeo has changed ; he is non seen as the 1 who stays off from the battles and wants to halt them go oning ; he is now seen as one of the people to get down them.
Another illustration of Shakespeare utilizing dramatic linguistic communication is when Romeo says
“ But love thee better than 1000 canst devise ” .
He said this to Tybalt and he meant that he loves Tybalt in a manner greater than he could conceive of significance he is now related to Tybalt as he is married to Juliet, Tybalt ‘s cousin. This is dramatic sarcasm in the drama as the audience knew that Romeo is married to Juliet but no 1 else does apart from the Nurse and Friar Laurence. By Romeo stating this it is demoing how the matrimony was impacting the lives of everyone. The matrimony was the ground that Tybalt killed Mercutio as if Romeo had non of been with Juliet he would non hold left her and interrupted the battle which would non hold caused Tybalt to knife Mercutio.
“ My really friend, hath got his mortal injury. In my behalf ; my repute discoloration ‘d ” .
Romeo is stating that Mercutio has been killed on his behalf. This is because the Capulets wanted to hold retaliation for Romeo gate crashing their party. This is the ground the battle started and if there battle had non have started Mercutio would non hold been killed. So because of this Romeo is now faulting the decease of Mercutio on himself even though it is clear that it is non his mistake as he did n’t turn up until the terminal of the battle. This is another manner that we are shown act 3 scene 1 is the turning point of the drama as all of the characters feelings and ideas maintain altering dramatically throughout act 3 scene 1.
The stagecraft of the drama is another manner that act 3 scene 1 was shown as the turning point to the drama. One manner that this was shown was the manner that Shakespeare showed person being stabbed. The histrion would have on a hog ‘s vesica under his apparels, this would be full of blood and when another histrion touched this with their blade it would split and the blood would come out doing the histrion expression as if he had been stabbed. This was really bloodstained but really effectual doing the audience believe the histrion had really been stabbed. This was used in act 3 scene 1 when Mercutio was stabbed and would hold dramatically affected the audiences temper and feelings this would hold been because they would hold felt as if the histrion had truly died and it would hold affected them as they would of felt as if they had merely watch person dice. This would hold besides entertained the audience as the Elizabethans loved blood and Gore and would be something that they would desire to see in a drama.
In decision, Act 3 scene 1 has many grounds that show it is the turning point to Romeo and Juliet and this is shown by Shakespeare utilizing the manner the characters feelings and ideas alteration throughout the act 3 scene 1. Besides the manner that Shakespeare used dramatic linguistic communication to alter the ideas and tenseness in the audience. The battle between Tybalt and Mercutio wholly changed the result of the drama this was because this battle led to Tybalt killing Mercutio which led to another battle between Tybalt and Romeo which ended with Romeo killing Tybalt. This so intend Romeo had to be punished and this is done by ostracizing him from Verona which meant when Friar Laurence and Juliet made a program for them to populate together, the inside informations do n’t acquire to Romeo and in the terminal they both end up killing themselves which lead to the drama stoping as a calamity. So if the battle in act 3 scene 1 had non taken topographic point the stoping to the drama would non hold been so sad. This is why act 3 scene 1 is decidedly the turning point to the drama as it earnestly changed the remainder of the drama.
I have analysed the linguistic communication used by Shakespeare and how he used linguistic communication to alter the temper of the audience and show that act 3 scene 1 is the turning point in Romeo and Juliet. I have besides analysed the manner that Shakespeare used characters and phase trade to demo this. After analyzing these points I think without act 3 scene 1 Romeo and Juliet would non be a calamity as it would non hold ended in the manner it did.