Castigliones “ The Book of Courtier ” , Mirandolas “ Dignity of Man ” , and Machiavellis “ The Prince ” all give their ain thoughts of what they believe must be practiced or achieved in order to obtain vertu or human excellence. During the Renaissance a adult males intent was to exert 1s excellence as a adult male. By being good educated, holding good calligraphy, cognizing how to sit, play, dance, sing, and dress good, work forces of high position gained regard and repute. These accomplishments besides helped achieve penchant and support among princes. In Shakespeare ‘s “ Hamlet Prince of Denmark ” , Hamlet puts whether he is a adult male of vertu into inquiry. Hamlet ‘s actions do non ever agree with each of the authors criterions but finally he has proven to be a adult male of vertu.

Castiglione describes human excellence as to about be without defect and gives long lists of what a adult male must make which includes physical legerity, tall tallness, and apparently effortless grace. Hamlet, in general, satisfies most of Castiglione ‘s standards but one portion that stands out is when Hamlet wrote the drama to see his uncle ‘s reaction to the reenactment of his male parent ‘s slaying. This showed Hamlet ‘s ability as an exceeding author which is one of Castiglione ‘s demands in going an exceeding courtier. Castiglione besides says “ in order to talk and compose good, is cognition ; for he who is nescient and has nil in his head that merits being heard, can neither state it nor compose it ” ( line 48 ) . Hamlet satisfies this demand in that he attended a university in Wittenberg before his male parent ‘s decease which could be the ground why Hamlet is so

Taylor 2

philosophical and is frequently inquiring inquiries that can non be easy answered. Hamlet is farther proven to be a adult male of vertu by Ophelia when she states that Hamlet was an admirable adult male before his insanity. “ O, what a baronial head is here o’erthrown! The courtier ‘s, soldier ‘s, bookman ‘s, oculus, lingua, blade, Th ‘ outlook and rose of the just province, The glass of manner and the mold of signifier, Th ‘ observ ‘d of all perceivers, rather, rather down! ” ( 3.1. 150-54 ) Ophelia notes Hamlet ‘s excellence acknowledging him as one time being a courtier, soldier, and bookman, every bit good as being a good talker and holding acceptable swordsmanship. All of which Castiglione considers to be indispensable to going a courtier.

Machiavelli ‘s “ The Prince ” outlines the necessary demands for a prince to follow in order to go a adult male of vertu and a successful swayer. Hamlet ‘s actions both agree and disagree with what Machiavelli ‘s has written which makes it hard to make up one’s mind whether Hamlet is adult male of vertu or non based on Machiavelli ‘s standards. Machiavelli provinces, “ It is necessary for a prince, who wishes to keep himself, to larn how non to be good, and utilize this cognition and non utilize it, harmonizing to the necessity of the instance. ” Machiavelli ‘s positions contrasts the methods used by Hamlet because Hamlet believes he must coerce the male monarch into lunacy and finally kill him in order to do affairs right. Hamlet struggles to keep his place as prince because he lacks the qualities of a prince mentioned by Machiavelli. Another feature of a Machiavellian prince is to perpetrate all inhuman treatments at once.A Machiavelli says, “ In taking a province the vanquisher must set up to perpetrate all his inhuman treatments at one time ” ( Machiavelli 62 ) .A Hamlet goes against this by non perpetrating all of his inhuman treatments at once.A He starts out by disrespecting his female parent, the Queen.A He says to her, “ I took thee for thy better.A Take thy luck ” ( 3.4. 32 ) .A He tells his female parent that she

Taylor 3

is non of import and that she got what she deserved and continued to knock his female parent throughout the play.A Hamlet commits another inhuman treatment by coercing Claudius to imbibe to the poisoned wine.A However Machiavelli writes, “ However a Prince should animate fright in such a manner that if he does non win love he may get away hatred. ” ( Machiavelli 61 ) . Throughout the drama Hamlet tries to do those he is close to look like he is brainsick and has changeless emotional effusions which strikes into everyone without conveying them excessively hate him. Machiavelli says that it is better to be feared than loved because those who are feared are less liked to be offended by others than those who are loved by others. Furthermore, Machiavelli says “ And if constrained to set any to decease, he should make so merely when there is manifest cause or sensible justification. ” ( Machiavelli 61 ) Hamlet killed Claudius because he murdered his male parent, but was holding uncertainties about whether he should kill Claudius or allow him populate. Machiavelli ‘s thoughts both comparison and contrast to those used by Hamlet. In the beginning, Hamlet procrastinated on revenging his male parent ‘s decease, but throughout the drama Hamlet begins to utilize the methods outlined by Machiavelli. One of Hamlet ‘s ends was to acquire and retain power and he proved that Claudius was an unfit male monarch, but tragically he died at the same clip that he did so. Hamlet had to do heartache by killing the male monarch, but in the terminal, he is seen as tragic prince. As a Machiavellian prince, Hamlet possessed good traits, every bit good as defects, which led to his ruin.

Mirandola ‘s “ Oration On the Dignity of Man ” Tells of how adult male is the superior being and is envied by all animals because adult male can command his ain fate holding the tools of ground and the ability of free will. He besides mentions how adult male is so superior that they are so near to being angels. Mirandola praises humanity and the human ability to ground, which offers the opposing

Taylor 4

position to Hamlet. Mirandola begins his essay by informing his readers that he knows where worlds stand in the order of the universe. “ When the work was finished, the Craftsman kept wishing that there were person to chew over the program of so great a workaˆ¦ thereforeaˆ¦ he eventually took thought refering the creative activity of adult male. ( Mirandola 224 ) . Mirandola believes that worlds were the last animals created by God, and that God ‘s intent, in making them, was to carry through his desire for person to appreciate his creative activities. , Hamlet frequently brings humanity ‘s intent in the existence into inquiry, and suggests that we are apart of a go oning rhythm in which we are born from and return to the Earth, no greater or less than any other animal, “ The earthaˆ¦ seems to me no more than a foul and baneful fold of bluess. What a piece of work is adult male! how baronial in ground! how infinite in module! aˆ¦in action how like an angel! in apprehensiveness how like a God! aˆ¦ And yet, to me, what is this ether of dust? adult male delights non me ” ( 2.2.280-89 ) At first, Hamlet seems to praise the qualities of humanity but inquiries whether or non worlds are truly every bit of import as like Mirandola stated. Hamlet asks how human existences can be so of import, if they are made from the Earth, merely like all of the other animate beings. “ To what bases utilizations may we return, Horatio? aˆ¦ Alexander died, Alexander was buried, Alexander returneth into dust: the dust is earth ; of Earth we make loam ; aˆ¦whereto he was converted, might they non halt a beer barrel? Disdainful Caesar, dead and turned to clay, might halt a hole to maintain the air current off. ” ( 5.1.170-88 ) Hamlet is non a adult male of vertus based on Mirandola ‘s criterions in that he inquiries humanity ‘s high quality to other animals.

Based on Castiglione ‘s, Mirandola ‘s, and Machiavelli ‘s authorship ‘s, Hamlet has been proven to be a adult male of vertu. Though his actions do non hold with Mirandola ‘s ideals, he has the

Taylor 5

necessary instruction by Castiglione ‘s criterions, and though possibly non a first, follows Machiavelli ‘s manner of the prince. Despite the fact that Hamlet had defects he has proven that he was finally a adult male of vertu.