The record of Sister Carrie has frequently been completed by opposing, at times fictional descriptions of the novel ‘s construction and publication. Being asked over his labour on Sister Carrie, Dreiser could non drawback from foregrounding the “ mysterious ” factor in his authorship class. He repeatedly explained his feeling of holding been “ usedaˆ¦ like a medium ” when he put down on a paper the first letters of the rubric, and of finishing the manuscript with the aid of “ inspiration ” that came “ all of a sudden aˆ¦of its ain agreement ” ( qtd. in Hochman, 1991: 43 )

In the procedure of composing Sister Carrie, Dreiser cultivated certain patterns of composing which more than evidently discourage the construct of independent inspiration advocated. Dreiser ‘s first attempt to compose down a novel, like Carrie ‘s introduction on phase, was assisted by demanding intercession of other people. Without a uncertainty, the changeless concern of friends, lovers, readers, and editors was necessary to Dreiser ‘s fiction composing throughout his life. Carrie ‘s is chiefly seen by Dreiser as a contemplation of himself, of his personal experience as a author. His word picture of Carrie, particularly on phase and wing, plays up both the inside informations of an creative person ‘s relationship with his or her audience and the elaboratenesss inherent in the act of representation itself. Carrie ‘s history besides describes the dynamism of those forces through which, as Dreiser comments, the creative person obtains free manner to his or her ain reservoir of energy or “ inspiration ” . ( Hochman, 1991: 43 )

Dreiser himself, from the clip of his reaching in Chicago, has been exited by the theatre, and he has devoted a portion of his life to it, as a play critic and had dreamed of going a playwright. “ With its beautiful actresses and suave, well-groomed histrions, its glister and its 1000s pretend exhilarations, the theatrical universe was to Dreiser a microcosm of the glamourous metropolis, a ether of its unreal lusters, and the theatre magnetizes his characters every bit good ” ( Lynn, 1991: 502 ) There is no urban establishment fascinates them about so much as the theatre does.

The theatre is present in the full novel. Dreiser ‘s characters go to dramas, act in them, socialise with the stars of the twenty-four hours and go stars themselves. All are spellbound by the universe of gaslight because it seems to offer the glamor and entire fulfilment which they continuously seek. As an ultimate desire, the theatre is compared to the charming luck cave that reveals to Aladdin. ( qtd. in Witemeyer, 1971: 236 ) The phase, is nil more than a mode of word picture of the mental procedure of Dreiser ‘s American fantasists. It besides helps to clear up the ironical difference between such make bolding dreams and hard worlds. Here are reflected Dreiser ‘s many utilizations of theatre in Sister Carrie.

His ain experience was clearly the theoretical account for Carrie ‘s. His wand-commanded fancy resembles that “ ebullient illusion ” in her, that “ ran public violence with every straw of chance, doing of it a aureate divining rob whereby the hoarded wealth of life was to be discovered ” ( 134 ) Carrie, as the many dreamers as her thinks of the theater as a unafraid manner to success and wealth: “ Frequently she had considered the phase as a door which she had so much craved. Now, as in Chicago, it came as a last resource in hurt ” ( 270 ) The aureate province is distinguished in Dreiser ‘s chapter rubrics as “ Elfland ” and Drouet is called “ A witless Aladdin ” when he unwittingly opens the door to its attractive force by acquiring a portion in a drama for Carrie. In her reactions to the ambiance of the Avery Theater, the same ground is clear ( Witemeyer, 1971: 237 ) :

“ This took her by the manus kindly, as one who says, “ My beloved, come in. ” It opened for her as if for its ain. She had wondered at the illustriousness of the names upon the bill-boards, the wonder of the long notices in the documents, the beauty of the frocks upon the phase, the ambiance of passenger cars, flowers, polish. Here was no semblance. Here was an unfastened door to see all of that. She had come upon it as one who stumbles upon a secret transition, and, behold, she was in the chamber of diamonds and delectation! ( 129 )

The critic Philip Fisher offers a different reading to the significance of Carrie ‘s theatrical calling. Therefore, he remarks that in the Chicago portion of the novel, Dreiser creates a “ hierarchy of work that rises to more and more straight affect selling the ego while at the same clip supplying a sanctuary for the ego within the more clearly acknowledged fictionality of its function. ( Fisher, 1991:549 ) This chiefly emphasizes the occupation character of Carrie ‘s playing and the roots of her pick being in the demand of work and implicitly of money.

At the extremum of the hierarchy of work that Dreiser had constructed is the actress. ( Fisher, 1991: 550 ) She makes money in a baronial manner, by entertaining the populace, and non, as in the beginning of the novel, laboring to last in a mill.

As a jilted occupation searcher and nastily paid mill worker, Carrie has had experience as a sort of castaway. Her experience in the cold universe of industrial capitalist economy “ throws into alleviation the glamorized, sentimentalized version of the castaway ” she interprets Laura in Under the Gaslight, even as the mawkishness of the drama she “ throws a disclosure visible radiation ” on her socially caused desires and concerns. ( Shulman, 1991: 569 )

Subsequently on in New York, Carrie ‘s belief that the theatre is a existent way to follow is enhanced: “ She saw a big, empty, shady play-house, still redolent of the aromas and blazomy of the dark, and noteworthy for its rich, oriental visual aspect. The admiration of it awed and delighted her. Blessed be its fantastic world ” ( 342 ) it might be interpreted that Dreiser ‘s allusion depicted by the adjectives ( big, empty, shadowy ) foreshadow Carrie ‘s dream made come true and the impact on her personality. The writer did non see this kind of self-deceit as undamaging ; in his ain instance he tells us, the inclination to misidentify melodrama for world was “ responsible for the enduranceaˆ¦of many semblances far beyond their normal length of life. ” ( qtd. in Witemeyer, 1971: 256 )

In one of the most open remarks on Carrie ‘s artistic endowment, Dreiser ab initio points at her “ sympathetic, waxy nature ” and “ passiveness of psyche which is ever the mirror of the active universe, ” as he continues to depict how she imitates the mimic, addresss, and conduit of actresses she attentively studied, he now focuses from passiveness to a artistic activity: “ it was nil more than the first elusive rock outcrops of an artistic nature, endeavouring to animate the perfect similitude of some stage of beauty. In such lame inclinations, be it known, such outworking of desire to reproduce life, lays the footing of all dramatic art ” ( 117 ) . Later on, when starts go toing Broadway plays with Mrs. Vance, Carrie remembers “ her one melodramatic accomplishment ” as something now present and comparable to “ worlds ” as the rocking-chair and the modern fiction she takes pleasance in. ( Lemaster, 2009: 52 )

“ For Carrieaˆ¦the phase had a great attractionaˆ¦It dwelt in her head and occupied her consciousness during many long afternoons in which her rocking-chair and her latest novel contributed the lone pleasances of her province. Never could she witness a drama without holding her ain ability vividly brought to her consciousness. aˆ¦ Almost constantly she would transport these graphic imaginativenesss off with her. She lived every bit much in these things as in the worlds which made up her life ” . ( 228 )

Therefore Carrie plays Laura in Under the Gaslight she may be taken as a substitute for the figure of the author, really much in demand of encouragement and support. At the same clip, though, Dreiser ‘s history of Carrie in this sequence reflects his belief that, under definite conditions, the acting ( and possibly the fiction-writing ) ego may hold entree to a scope of satisfactions unavailable in any other context. Carrie in Under the Gaslight is to the full involved in her playing when the procedure of representation is accompanied by instantaneous reaction and suppot from friendly audience. ( Hochman, 1991: 45 )

Harmonizing to the critic Barbara Hochman Carrie ‘s best public presentation is in that voluntary recreational production of Under the Gaslight. For it the support of Hurstwood insures a friendly, a good-natured audience, and during which portion the audience ends up on the other side of the footlights. Merely when Drouet comes backstage after the weak first scene to “ buoy Carrie up ” ( 134 ) in her attempts does Carrie derive entree to her full originative energy. ( Hochman, 1991: 45 )

The interchange of semblance is compounded because within the drama Laura is exposed as an impostor, a disclosure that helps do the portion that “ affected Carrie deeply. It reminded her somehow of her ain province. ” ( 163 ) Army for the liberation of rwanda from being able to pull instantly on her ain emotions, frights, and desires, nevertheless, Carrie is able to reflect merely after Drouet gives her an admiring audience to move for. Reflected in the mirror of his esteem, she so enters into the portion of the rejected castaway and exhibits the feelings that inflame both Drouet and Hurstwood and do them make up one’s mind to possess her. ( Shulman, 1991:570 )

Once Carrie evolves as an actress she becomes more and more “ professional ” and her witnesss progressively remote. As her sense of privacy additions, the compensations for the dramatic public presentation bit by bit fade. By the clip Carrie resides in the Waldorf, at the terminal of the novel, the energetic image of Drouet wing, buoying Carrie up, has been replaced by a clump of letters from aliens, more or less command to “ purchase ” her. Merely the concluding meeting with Robert Ames evokes the unfastened support that one time permitted her to admit the true power and pleasance of her endowment. ( Hochman, 1991: 45 )

In Austin Daly ‘s melodrama, virtuousness is richly rewarded before the concluding drape. Laura, who has been ready to give everything, finally wins back non merely her adult male and her money, but her standing in society and her brightest outlooks for the hereafter. This happy stoping, nevertheless, is nowhere suggested in Dreiser ‘ ain text. Thus Carrie ‘s Laura, stoically confronting her troubles, remains a affecting figure of loss, while Carrie herself becomes a “ medium ” for what Robert Ames calls “ the universe ‘s sorrow and yearning ” ( 356 )

It is in fact the embodying loss ; yet, Carrie feels her supreme satisfactions. Carrie ‘s gift for moving therefore comes out from the text as a complex and contradictory quality. Carrie ‘s endowment is her most flexible plus ; it catapults her into a place of famous person and wealth. ( Hochman, 1991:46 ) Yet it is at the same clip the beginning of satisfactions that, from Dreiser ‘ point of position are so “ without monetary value ” ( 139 )

When Carrie “ dawnsaˆ¦upon the audience, handsome, and proud, traveling frontward with a steady grace, Born of inspiration ” ( 135 ) , she is forgetful of other histrions and audience likewise. It is a alone minute in Carrie ‘s experience. Her theatrical endowment affords her both a passionate sense of human bond and an unexcelled bang of independency. Later, due to her endowment money come along, at the same clip offering her a manner out, non merely from the skiding fortunes of the market place but from life in society wholly. It allows Carrie, to stand for distinctness, even while conveying her ain personal melancholy of desire. ( Hochman, 1991:46 )

Toward the terminal of the novel, Robert Ames, speaks of Carrie ‘s “ natural look ” as the beginning of her dramatic power. To him Carrie ‘s face is “ representative of all desire ” ( 356 ) . But Carrie ‘s first victory as an actress derives non merely from her capacity to prosecute in a common interaction with witnesss. Before analyzing Carrie ‘s first public presentation in item, it might be stated that the act of representation is seen to hold its beginnings in desire and its greatest satisfaction in a procedure that begins in association -dependence but that finally affords the ego and enraptured but ephemeral experience of high independency.

Drouet disregards Carrie by misreading her temper when he finds her swaying unhappily in the twilight, but he more than makes up for it when Carrie plays Laura in Under the Gaslight. Both during the readying and on introduction dark, Drouet is ardently supportive and friendly-in short, the perfect audience. Drouet ‘s function in this episode is important, non merely assisting Carrie to recognize her dramatic potency, but besides in easing her to recognize-and therefore delectation in -her achievement. It seems that a collaborate presence was important non merely for conveying forth artistic energy, but besides for mirroring the satisfaction of success back to the hesitating performing artist. Consequently the deficiency of a witness partly explains Carrie ‘s failure to comprehend her ain felicity when she sits entirely in her rocking chair. ( qtd. in Hochman, 1991:48 )

Carrie ‘s reading of Laura signifies a high point of satisfaction, hope, delectation, emotional intensity-not merely for Carrie, but besides for Hurstwood and Drouet. What seems apparent is that Drouet, Hurstwood, and Carrie herself all come near the Elks undertaking with a typical speech pattern on the accomplishment their ain involvement. When Drouet advises Carrie to take the portion of Laura, it is merely “ an easy manner out ” ( 115 ) of a difficult duty. Similarly, Hurstwood ‘s attempts on behalf of her public presentation -both his original encouragement of Carrie and his attempt to “ do it a dress-suit matter and give the small miss a opportunity ” ( 121 ) -come mostly from his intent to affect her by exposing his qualities, to gain from her turning wages. ( Hochman, 1991: 50 )

The theatre and the mirroring in the face of an audience emphasize the absence of a strong, built-in ego and Carrie ‘s ability to react to the socially generated demands of public presentation and show. Carrie ‘s success in the theater is owned to “ her melancholy, her passiveness, her weak sense of ego, and her reactivity ” to the strain of show and act every bit good suited to a society of visual aspects. ( Shulman, 1991: 570 )

The full Under the Gaslight sequence is informed by Carrie ‘s demand of encouragement, support, congratulations, feedback-now from Drouet, now from Hurstwood. Both work forces contribute significantly to Carrie ‘s success. Her victory is the consequence of a genuinely common attempt of the three. To foreground the flood tide of the state of affairs during Carrie ‘s public presentation, Hurstwood wholly his sense of the difference between the participant and the individual, between the theatre of melodrama and his ain theatre of visual aspects. ( Shulman, 1991: 570 )

As Hochman further considers, this effort may be seen as a manner for what Dreiser considered to be “ the ideal flowering of artistic representation, climaxing in the creative person ‘s fleeting capacity to exceed non merely the demand for, but even the consciousness of, all witnesss ” . ( Hochman, 1991: 50 )

The form is already clear in the episode when Drouet foremost asks Carrie to allow him see her executing what she has worked on but Carrie is loath. A small of Drouet ‘s encouragement allows Carrie to get the better of her suppressions and eventually to execute “ the ball-room episode with considerable feeling, burying, as she got deeper into the scene, all about Drouet, and allowing herself rise to a all right province of feeling. ” ( 119 ) Ironically, if now Carrie can non get down without Drouet ‘s encouragement, her “ all right province of feeling ” depends upon her “ forgettingaˆ¦about Drouet ” wholly. Furthermore, her gradual coldness to Drouet makes her reading of Laura, in bend, the more alluring to him. ( Hochman, 1991: 50 )

This theoretical account is insistent when Carrie plays Laura on opening dark. Despite Hurstwood ‘s support, which guarantees a big turn-out at the event ; a “ well-groomed, good-natured, flatteringly-inclined audience was assured from the minute he thought of helping Carrie ” ( 127 ) , Carrie ‘s beggining in the first scene is improbably lame. It is merely when Drouet goes backstage that she “ revives a small. Grateful for the drummer ‘s presenceaˆ¦.tried to believe she could make it. “ ( 133 ) Drouet, for his portion, keeps up a steady flow of supportive talk while Carrie delaies in the wings for her cue. When the prompter announces, she begins to do her entryway, “ weak, as of all time, but all of a sudden her nervus partly returned. She thought of Drouet looking. ” ( 133 ) After the scene Drouet is ready to praise and promote Carrie. Finally his attempts have the intended consequence: he “ buoyed Carrie up most effectually ”

“ He began to do her feel as if she had done really well.A The old melancholy of desire began to come back as he talked at her, and by the clip the state of affairs rolled around she was running high in feelingaˆ¦ .

“ Come, misss, ” said Mrs. Van Dam, solemnly, “ allow us look after our things.A They are no longer safe when such an complete stealer enters. “ A A

“ Cue, ” said the prompter, near to her side, but she did non hear.A Already she was traveling frontward with a steady grace, Born of inspiration.A She dawned upon the audience, handsome and proud, switching, with the necessity of the state of affairs, to a cold, white, incapacitated object, as the societal battalion moved off from her scornfully.A A

A Hurstwood blinked his eyes and caught the infection.A The radiating moving ridges of feeling and earnestness were already interrupting against the farthest walls of the chamber.A The thaumaturgy of passion, which will yet fade out the universe, was here at work.A A ( 134-135 )

This minute reproduces the illustration of congratulations and support which was depicted earlier in the scene between Drouet and Carrie. Drouet ‘s encouraging presence finally issues in Carrie ‘s whole hearted designation with her function. Temporarily transformed in Laura, the sound of her “ phase name ” makes her “ start ” . Carrie has the ability to alter “ gender books ” and to “ reproduce life ” in her “ first-class representation ” ( 119 ) subsequently sequences of Under the Gaslight, when she is, to utilize Hochman ‘s phrase, “ a substitute for the figure of the author. ” Early on in the presentation, Carrie is refused any authorization in her addresss since she is merely portion of a company “ so weak-kneed that the lines were simply spoken ” and since her punctilious discourse hit Drouet as “ a deathlike thing, ” a “ thing ” that appears “ pathetic ” because “ Carrie did non acquire it. She seemed to be speaking in her slumber ” ( 132 ) . Carrie begins to “ acquire it, ” nevertheless, when she turns her earlier touching readying in her level with Drouet into an internal object: “ Carrie remembered her victory in the room. She tried to believe she could make it. ” “ Put in catch, ” Drouet encourages her, “ that ‘s the thing ” ( 133 ) , though at this point the energy she gathers round is still dependent on a mental projection of herself as an object looked at by males: “ her nervus partly returned. She thought of Drouet looking ” ( 133 ) . ( Lemaster, 2009: 51 )

Within the text of Sister Carrie “ the theater emerges as an sphere for the flow of desire ” uttered both in the really act of representation and in the contact between performing artist and witness. ( Hochman, 1991: 47 ) But Carrie ‘s “ desire to reproduce life ” , as articulated on phase through her melodramatic gift, completes a figure of other maps that underscore the difference between desire as passion and desire as representation. For one thing, the organisation of the theater imposes the separation between audience and actress that allows Carrie unrestrictive to expose her desire-full ego, without put on the lining its being appropriated. ( Hochman, 1991: 47 )

Carrie ‘s aptitude to inspire things is put accent on merely before she delivers the impressive address, charged with rhetoric idea, on a adult female ‘s permanent love, a contributory address to “ the creative activity of the calamity of fondness in Hurstwood ” ( 138 ) . The “ deplorable ” playing of the histrion that plays her lover, Dreiser insists, “ could non now spoil the stamp ambiance which Carrie had created and maintained. She would hold done about every bit good with a block of wood. The accoutrements she needed were within her ain imaginativeness. The moving Doctor of Optometry others could non impact them. ” ( 139 ) . What she visualizes, though, relates small to the external world of her being, but she resembles Dreiser. It is merely an idyllic kingdom that Carrie builds when she speaks of a adult female ‘s love given the capitalist decrease of adult females ‘s ‘ function to “ titillating trade goods ” ( Lemaster, 2009: 52 )

“ Let the adult female you look upon be wise or vain, ” said Carrie, her eyes set unhappily upon her lover, who had sunk into the place, “ beautiful or homely, rich or hapless, she has but one thing she can truly give or refuse-her bosom. aˆ¦ ”

“ Her beauty, her humor, her achievements, she may sell to you, but her love is a hoarded wealth without money and without monetary value. aˆ¦ ”

“ Remember, ” she concluded tenderly, “ love is all a adult female has to give, but it is the lone thing which God permits us to transport beyond the grave. “ ( 139-40 )

Talking as from her ain experience in interchanging sex for money, apparels, and security, Carrie entirely admits how adult females “ sell ” themselves in a capitalist economic system, and she therefore speaks with authorization. She still takes money for her services, intending that on the phase she accepts being the incarnation of male illusions, yet she “ invests ” least some of that money to her interruption out from poorness by making her ain economic system of the wages: “ Her bag was unfastened to him whose demand was greatest ” ( 369 ) . “ The gesture seems ineffectual in the context of Dreiser ‘s plaintive philosophizing, but it contains the residue of power and self-worth she experienced in the Avery Theater ” when she declared herself in ownership of “ love, ” the individual thing that, “ without money and without monetary value, ” can be shared by her. ( Lemaster, 2009:54 )

It is merely at that place, playing the function of another adult female, that Carrie can be certain of keeping the distance between herself and those members of the audience to whom she was “ a delightful small morsel aˆ¦ [ whose ] frown they would hold loved to coerce away with busss ” ( 326 ) . It is valid, of class that the place of the actress supposes a sort of merchandising or at least leasing desire and ego that has long contributed to the association of actress and cocotte in Western civilization. ( qtd. in Hochman, 1991: 53 )

Philip Fisher states that an actress “ her ego, her interior emotional being is what is sold to the ticket holdersaˆ¦.the personality and verve entirely remain to sell. ” ( Fisher, 1991:550 ) Therefore Carrie ‘s acting abilities are shared with the populace and at the same clip, one time once more her individuality, from the scene this clip, belongs to those theatre departers that pay to see her.

The “ sexualizing quality ” moving involves, sheltered as it is by phantasy and the barrier of the phase that separates the idolized actress from the assorted supporters, from the audience, that let their imaginativeness run public violence, reiterates the contradiction that was present in the fiction of her function of an actress who “ sells exactly the verve of her personality ” . ( Fisher, 1991: 551 ) “ Intimacy of self-presence and familiarity of sexual relation are both paradoxically present in the neutralised, stage-lit universe of pretension ” . Carrie ‘s success as an actress has effects every bit good. She begins to have a “ regular watercourse of matrimony proposals ” from work forces who know nil of her but what they have seen in her public presentation. ( Fisher, 1991: 552 ) If sexual desire makes the ego more vulnerable, more dependent on the other, the desire for representation, as we have seen, has exactly the opposite effect-for a piece. Within Sister Carrie, merely the desire for representation affords the ego a unafraid vantage point from which to see “ joys and sorrows which we my ne’er be permitted on our ain behalf ” ( 117 ) ( Hockman, 1991: 54 )

Obviously Carrie ‘s melodramatic gift, whatever its negative facets, is to be distinguished non merely from the common experience but besides from the common objects of desire. As Phillip Fisher suggests: “ the life history of ( an object ) is one of continual diminution. All goods used up and replaced. ” By contrast Carrie ‘s self-sufficient revitalizing endowment permits her to progress in the same field without wishing to step aside from it. ( Fisher, 1991, 553 )

Dreiser is the first novelist who lays his full sense of the ego over the dramatic possible innate in a vivacious society. “ Acting involves chiefly in Dreiser non misrepresentation but pattern, non falseness but installment payments on the universe of possibility. In Sister Carrie playing is a changeless societal maneuver. As a jeer of earnestness the words that provide Carrie ‘s brake into a speaking portion in New York and hence her rise to stardom are important 1s. “ ( Fisher, 1991: 553 ) To the Vizier in forepart of whom she is being displayed as one of the hareem misss she says, in reply to his idle inquiry, “ Well, who are you? ” “ I am yours genuinely ” ( 314 ) In the really insolent impertinence with which she improvises her answer she marks herself as a free independent adult female while her words ( her portion ) declare her a slave. Somewhat moving in Sister Carrie ever operates to continue a “ freedom of the ego from its visual aspect ” , and it is to that grade that it records a higher version of the possible or prospective ego in defiance of the fleeting “ function ” or “ portion ” that it is compelled to play and be recognized in.

However if Carrie on phase at the Avery Theatre comes to see her deepest feelings and greatest satisfactions, there are drawbacks merely the same, both collaborative interactions with others and in the stimulating sense of liberty that follows. The instant the “ independency of success ” begins to bestir in Carrie ‘s bosom and she begins to travel “ out of the ranks of the petitioners into the lines of the dispensers of charity ” ( 144 ) , the vocabulary of power, societal standing, and economic sciences that governs her experience off phase is already confirming its precedence. It is possibly in this sense that Carrie is so “ every bit happy as she would of all time be ” when her desire for inventive representation is fulfilled in the purdah of her swaying chair, instead than in public. ( Hochman, 1991: 59 )

At the terminal Carrie returns Carrie to her swaying chair one time more-but now she herself is a reader of novels. As Donald Pizer points out, the sarcasm implicit in Carrie ‘s sympathetic response to Pere Gorriot is correspondent to the sarcasm of Carrie ‘s success in playing the virtuous Laura. ( Pizer, 1976: 71 )

“ The concluding kernel of playing is, of class, stand foring what is non, imitating anger one does non fell, crying cryings at 20 past nine dark after dark, convincingly stand foring one dark a mean landlord and the following a benign and brave physician. To value and further the accomplishments of the histrion is to honor those able to not-be themselves, non experience what they in fact feel and, hence, to strike at the bosom of a societal order based on full single being and public self-representation. ” ( Fisher, 1991: 551 ) Therefore as the critic provinces, incarnating another character the histrion comes to see emotions so distant from his ain existent province, that sometimes he loses himself in this simulation of world. But Carrie seems to hold this gift, of feigning to be something she is non even before detecting her passion for moving.

In Under the Gaslight, Carrie reasserts “ trade good civilization by agencies of a multi-dimensional rhetorical manner that mirrors Dreiser ‘s auctorial voice ” ( Lemater, 2009: 53 ) . Carrie is the topic of a procedure of reading and representation, yet “ she is non unlike the author of a literary text, who has imbued its material objects with symbolic significances, or the reader of the text, who learns to construe its symbolic codifications ” ( qtd. in Lemater, 2009: 53 ) .

Carrie had the singular gift to presume the functions life itself challenged her with. In the last talk between, after Carrie had become a successful comedienne, Ames urges her to give up comedy and seek for serious parts, where her endowments will be more valuable to others and will therefore ( Markels, 1991: 514 )

“ aˆ¦aˆ¦You have this quality in your eyes and oral cavity and in your nature. You can lose it, you know. If you turn off from it and unrecorded to fulfill yourself entirely, it will travel fast plenty. The expression will go forth your eyes. Your oral cavity will alter. Your power to move will vanish. You may believe they wo n’t, but they will. Nature takes attention of that. ”

Here is Carrie ‘s concluding realisation, the consciousness that if she lives merely to fulfill herself she will lose herself. Her ceaseless floating toward merely what satisfies herself had led her to cover with “ the demand of Nature that she consciously shape her experience to run in the channels of altruism ” ( Markels, 1991: 5140

. She played the function of a celebrated actress but merely after go throughing through a series of other non so baronial functions did she contour her endowment. She played in turns the function of kept woman, married woman, terpsichorean, worker, sisteraˆ¦ but the functions existent life confronted her with helped her prepare for the universe of theatre or it might be stated that the theatre prepared her for the existent life. She ascended to the topographic point of an honored star taking pleasance in well-off being brought about her material prosperity, but she is still experiencing unhappy. At the minute at the pinnacle of her fabulous theatrical calling, she undergoes religious emptiness, which chiefly exemplifies in her letdown with her success.