The Relationship Between Realism And Romance English Literature Essay

Q: Analyse the relationship between pragmatism and love affair in Oroonoko. You should specify those footings carefully after confer withing at least one lexicon of critical footings.

Within the articulation of Oroonoko- Aphra Behn, lies the meticulously entwined relationship of pragmatism and love affair. Two self-contradictory genres encompassed into one 17th century novel leting Behn to venture into and permeate this controversial experimentation of composing manners. Therefore gestating possibly a radical allegorical novel of romantic pragmatism. Mary Ann O’Donnell describes Behn ‘s authorship as ‘ … common people and fairytale motives combine with blunt pragmatism and ambivalency about the supporter as the narrative explores the destructive power of love. ‘[ 1 ]

Harmonizing to the Dictionary of literary footings and literary theory, pragmatism is defined as ‘ … the portraiture of life with fidelity. It is therefore non concerned with idealization ; with rendering things beautiful when they are non. ‘[ 2 ]Conversely love affair is ‘ … concerned with characters and events who like in a courtly universe slightly remote from the mundane. This suggests elements of phantasy, improbableness, extravagancy and naivete… love, escapade, the fantastic and the “ mythic ” . ‘[ 3 ]Obviously the intense juxtaposing features of both genres cause huge clash imparting the novel to surround precariousness, from an analytical position. However, it can be argued that Behn ‘s incorporation and ejection of peculiar elements of love affair and pragmatism renders the fresh deeply complete. Out of the antithesis between the two voices in the text, the two nationalities, and two species of people, rises the reader ‘s empyreal realization that Oroonoko is an absolute and culminated novel. A lexicon of modern critical footings argues ‘ … on this position of pragmatism, the ideal novel would be a unflawed mirror to the universe ; but since linguistic communication is ne’er impersonal, such a novel is impossible ‘[ 4 ]. Whereas love affair is identified to be ‘ … concerned with an professedly assumed universe… an inventive and psychological projection of the “ existent ” universe. ‘[ 5 ]

From origin, Behn vows to the reader she will non give ‘the history of this royal slave to entertain my reader with a feigned hero… ‘ ( Oroonoko, penguin classics, p. 75 )[ 6 ]. By calling her novel ‘Oroonoko, A Royal Slave, A True History ‘ accumulates a sense of acceptance in the reader towards her aim and impartial callback of Oroonoko ‘s narrative. This claim besides has a wider contextual association attached to it ; Behn declares that she does non asseverate or claim her narrative authorization as some male monarchs claim their throne. Bing a outstanding oculus informant of the happening events, understanding and empathy she conveys to reader molds and cements their trust in her narrative. However she subsequently says ‘ … from the oral cavity of the main histrion in this history… ‘ ( Oroonoko, p. 75 )[ 7 ]. Behn ‘s lexical pick of ‘actor ‘ immediately disembodies the cocksureness built up in the reader. Implying ‘actors ‘ , a frontage emerges uprooting the pragmatism promised by this deictic storyteller sabotaging her credibleness. Factual and documentary histories should basically drive idealized, Herculean and romanticised ‘actors ‘ . Therefore hovering uncertainness is woven into the first words of Oroonoko bridging propinquity yet distance between reader and storyteller.

Many critics such as Ian Watt rebuke and denude Behn ‘s feminocentric novel as “ an old fashioned love affair ” withstanding the “ pragmatism that chiefly became the opposite word of “ idealism ” engraved into the enemies of realists ‘[ 8 ]. He farther dictates that a ‘novel ‘s pragmatism does non shack in the sort of life it presents, but in the manner it presents it ‘[ 9 ]. What Watt fails to admit is that Behn ‘s pragmatism is situated within her romantic codifications. She is consciously cognizant of the parlous resistance of advancing the idealistic values of Oroonoko ‘s nobility against the matter-of-fact societal norms of the settlers. Possibly her motivation is to obversely make a harmonious balance between pragmatism and love affair as a analogue to Oroonoko ‘s robust maleness with Imoinda ‘s effeminate features. Watt, on the other manus, efforts to push out his definition of pragmatism as a signifier of combat against Behn ‘s dialectic thesis of intertwining both these genres. Myra Reynolds praises Oroonoko claiming ‘ … Mrs Behn ‘s short, simple, vigorous, and impacting narrative of existent life comes with a startling sense of freshness. ‘[ 10 ]as opposed to Watt ‘s ‘ … Behn ‘s work of mediaeval hagiography ‘[ 11 ]

Furthermore, the hardy definition of pragmatism in itself must be scrutinised. It is contradictory to bring forth a work of “ realistic ” fiction. By nature prose fiction is nil more but mere fiction, hence configuring an reliable portraiture of a prevarication and claiming it to be true, arguably depicts that pragmatism is every bit much romanticised as love affair is. It is deficient to proclaim pragmatism is merely contrived within the manner an experience is retold, but besides the content of the experience must be accounted for.

Despite the obvious defect within realistic prose fiction, Behn hyperbolises the romantic word pictures and events in her novel. First the character ‘s names are notional and unrealistic, ‘Oroonoko ‘ and ‘Imoinda ‘ . However, although these names extricate the characters from world it gently and bit by bit teleports the readers imaginativeness to the remotely immaterial and privy land of Coramantien. Their notional names do non needfully estrange the reader, but urges them to inquire and wonder at a universe so withdrawn from their ain. Subsequently through the fresh Oroonoko is renamed Caesar. This allusion gives the semblance of the metempsychosis of Oroonoko ; a royal prince reborn a ointment. Ironically, a slave reborn with possibly the greatest name in history ; repeating the cyclic evocation of binary antonyms running throughout Oroonoko such as black and white, African and European, slavery and colonialism and most peremptorily pragmatism and love affair.

Besides the physical and mental properties of these high position characters proves that love affair supersedes pragmatism ‘ this face was non of that brown rusty black which most of that state are, but a perfect coal black, or polished jet. ‘[ 12 ]( Oroonoko, p. 80-81 ) . From this alone, Oroonoko emerges as compellingly superior to his race. The enunciation of ‘perfect ‘ and ‘polished ‘ infer that Oroonoko is slightly of a plasticised heroic statuette, typifying gallantry, virtuousness and aristocracy. These romantic properties correlate to the definition of love affair ; non-didactic characters of beauty, extravagancy and phantasy[ 13 ]. The texture of Oroonoko and in bend Imoinda contextually symbolise the British monarchy of the 17th century. Behn was a devout monarchist, the univocal representation of upper-class royal characters echo her high perceptual experience of the monarchy ‘he had heard of the late civil wars in England and distressing decease of our great sovereign ‘ ( Oroonoko, p. 80 ) . Attempts to depict Oroonoko every bit realistically as possible in maintaining with her initial promise her otiose romantic sentence structure and lexis unveils her attitudes and values and therefore her political docket.

Finally Oroonoko and Imoinda ‘s persistently impeded love foreshadows their tragically destructive decease. Stereotypically, love sheathes the feeling of immortality, safety and fusion of head, organic structure and psyche between two people. By Behn encapsulating love in its rawest signifier within their decease, she deconstructs the traditional conventions of romantic novels, with the idealized Utopian coda. The paratactic construction of ‘he foremost resolved… as the relation of it was to me afterwards ‘ ( Oroonoko, p. 135-136 )[ 14 ]high spots the documentary-like pragmatism of the novel, similar to Daniel Defoe ‘s Robinson Crusoe.[ 15 ]Such as ‘ ( … cryings gushed in malice of him, from his eyes ) he told her his design of first killing her, and so his enemies, and following himself, and the impossibleness of get awaying and hence he told her the necessity of deceasing. ‘ ( Oroonoko, p.135 )[ 16 ]. Furthermore, the content of this infusion is superlatively romanticised. Oroonoko and Imoinda ‘s severe decease itself becomes their romantic culmination. Their matrimony, consummation and kid birth are all susceptibly displaced by decease. Therefore it is merely within their decease, that these ‘greatly born, reasonable, beautiful, immature and fond ‘ ( Oroonoko, p. 135 )[ 17 ]lovers can they happen their ageless peace and euphory ; therefore sealing Oroonoko as a tragic novel, instead than a romantic 1. The juxtaposing relationship between the realistic construction of Oroonoko and the romantic content of the outline decidedly reinforces the equilibrium of the novel.

Behn notes that ‘wives have a regard for their hubbies equal to what any other people pay a divinity ‘ ( Oroonoko, p.135-136 )[ 18 ]. From one lexical pick ‘deity ‘ derives a cogent spiritual analogy of Oroonoko ‘s full development. As a royal prince, Oroonoko personifies an angel-like ‘deity ‘ of supernatural quality. He so transcends into a adynamic suicidal slave therefore insinuating a fallen angel. Finally ‘to putting to death this hoarded wealth of his psyche, ‘ ( Oroonoko, p.135 )[ 19 ]the fallen angel mutates into the angel of decease, suppressing and prehending ‘souls ‘ . Pathos immediately grippingly encapsulates the reader and the one time deeply venerable Oroonoko affectingly transforms into a misanthrope.

Conclusively, Oroonoko is an incontrovertible love narrative with all the conventions of a love affair yet, the blunt pragmatism antagonises the notional construction. The sexual intercourse of two radically opposing genres obliterates the sexual intercourse of Oroonoko and Imoinda- an inextricable love that denies difference. Therefore romantic pragmatism becomes Oroonoko and Oroonoko ‘s ending tragic flaw.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *