The Semantic Derogation of Woman

The Semantic Derogation of Woman

In the reading of Muriel Schulz “ The Semantic Derogation of Woman ” , the writer negotiations about words in which describe adult female in a slang or profound manner. The writer says this is because work forces fear adult female ‘s attitudes and this is the lone manner they can allow it out. Schulz ‘s negotiations about how words over clip which were nice and gentlemanlike like or had a good significance have become ill-mannered and calumniatory towards adult female. I hope by the terminal of this paper you will break understand what Schulz ‘s point of position was seeking to do clear.

The chief issue the writer points out is how the linguistic communication we use today will transport through to new coevalss. She says it throughout the paper that work forces of degenerated all of these words in some manner or signifier to diss adult female. For illustration she says Shakespeare degenerated the word lewd to intend cocotte ( Schulz, 45 ) . No affair how little or distinct we are about utilizing slang words sooner or later a new coevals will get down to utilize it and unless a coevals decides to halt utilizing a portion of linguistic communication it will go on to go through on. Work force throughout history have designed the linguistic communication throughout the coevalss and have ever made unequal ‘s. For illustration, “all work forces are created equal” this statement coming from our establishing male parents. Two things are incorrect with that sentence: initiation male parents, non establishing female parents, and all work forces are created equal non all worlds are created equal. Though it is true work forces have wrote the linguistic communication and Torahs we presently and had antecedently used, the hereafter looks brighter and brighter for adult female as they infiltrate the authorities. Not merely this, but adult female are a immense portion of how we are raised. They are non merely learning us in the schoolroom, but at place excessively. This I believe disproves the writer who states work forces help adult females remain out of the office. There is no manner adult female would be in office if it was n’t for work forces standing up for adult female and vote for them excessively. This is where I believe Schulz deficiencies grounds for her instance.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

The following portion of the article Schulz negotiations about is the slander used to depict old or fleshy adult female. She talks about how work forces have made words like “cow” and “warhorse” to depict these adult females ( Schulz, 43 ) . I believe half of this is true. I ‘ve ne’er heard an old or fleshy adult female called a warhorse ( Schulz, 44 ) . A warhorse or steed normally refers to a immature, fast, athletic individual. However, she does name other footings that I would hold to the full agreed upon like “hag” . Older ladies still today are called old beldam and still today it ‘s an abuse ( Schulz, 43 ) . Peoples who are fleshy these yearss are stilled called cattles, and old people are called old beldam, these are both abuses. Once once more she lacks grounds and makes a error stating that if you called a adult male a grandma he would take it as an abuse. If I were called a grandma I would merely look at the individual amusing and state do I look like a miss to you.

The following issue Schulz negotiations approximately is how words like “tramp” and “mistress” have degenerated over clip to go words that describe adult female if they have sex excessively much or darnel on their adult male ( Schulz, 46 ) . She makes a good point in that things adult female do which assist pleasance work forces are made to look degrading, and are looked down upon. Such Acts of the Apostless for illustration are depriving and harlotry. I would hold to hold with the writer full heartily on this issue. Even though work forces love lean small outfits on misss, I ca n’t assist and look back on how hypocritical we are on those misss. Some of these misss are good sophisticated immature ladies merely seeking to do a vaulting horse, so they can acquire through college and go a helpful individual to society. A good illustration would be Lady Gaga who is now a well known dad vocalist in the state. Even though her parents were good off and could pay for her college, she decided to deprive to pay for her college and do herself an independent adult female.

The concluding thing the writer brings up is why work forces fear to be inferior with adult females. She says work forces merely ca n’t stand it that misss are biologically stronger than work forces during the early phases of life because misss hit puberty faster. Girls besides have a longer lifetime and are less likely to acquire diseases. For this work forces must state hostile things to adult female to do themselves experience superior and do adult female experience worthless. The writer here is seeking to complete off the reader here with a last onslaught against work forces, but she makes some errors. Yes, male childs do experience a small weaker when misss start to turn taller than the, so they do state intend things to do themselves experience superior. However, when work forces in their early mid-twentiess are taller than these misss a why do they diss these misss now. It ‘s surely non because their disquieted these misss are traveling to outlive them in life, it ‘s because cats think it ‘s cool to demo off in forepart of their friends, and see how bad they can diss a miss. I merely experience the writer truly ne’er covers this age group throughout the article.

To reason I think this paper was really good written overall. This women’s rightist truly has a passion for what she ‘s speaking about and truly shows it throughout the paper. However, I do experience that she did miss grounds sometimes during the paper, and this can go forth holes in her narrative. I hope I have helped you understand what Schulz ‘s feminist point of position was seeking to do clear.

Plants Cited

King, James. hypertext transfer protocol: // . 7 April 2009.

“ warhorse. ” Unabridged. Random House, Inc. 15 Dec. 2009. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *